Control of wiregrass (Sporobolus indicus) by planting Panicum maximum varieties
Barra lateral del artículo
Publicado:
mar. 1, 2011
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
The control of wiregrass (Sporolobus indicus) was assessed by the renewal of an improved pasture in state of degradation, with 50 % of
wiregrass and 20 of Guinea grass, using varieties of the Panicum genus. The treatments were: Guinea grass Likoni, Common, Mombaza,
Tanzania and tillage without sowing. The performance of the treatments was characterized through univariate and multivariate analyses. It
was proved that Guinea grass Likoni and Mombaza had better control of wiregrass. As the prevalence of the Guinea grass for both varieties
Likoni and Mombaza was increased, the population density was lower in wiregrass. The biomass availability was similar in both, in respect
to the prevalence of this weed. The percentage of Guinea grass was superior to 60 %, even in the tillage without sowing, in respect to the
initial vegetation sampling. However, the highest percentage of the improved pasture was found in Likoni and Mombaza. The Tanzania and
the Common varieties exerted lower control in wiregrass, or quite similar as to that of the tillage without sowing. It is concluded that the
Likoni and Mombaza cultivars controlled wiregrass much more. The multivariate analysis allowed establishing the relationship between the
variables, and explaining integrally the results of the renewal. The use of the Likoni and Mombaza varieties as alternative for controlling
wiregrass in improved pastures in state of degradation is recommended.
Key words: grass, wiregrass, varieties, Panicum, Biplot.
wiregrass and 20 of Guinea grass, using varieties of the Panicum genus. The treatments were: Guinea grass Likoni, Common, Mombaza,
Tanzania and tillage without sowing. The performance of the treatments was characterized through univariate and multivariate analyses. It
was proved that Guinea grass Likoni and Mombaza had better control of wiregrass. As the prevalence of the Guinea grass for both varieties
Likoni and Mombaza was increased, the population density was lower in wiregrass. The biomass availability was similar in both, in respect
to the prevalence of this weed. The percentage of Guinea grass was superior to 60 %, even in the tillage without sowing, in respect to the
initial vegetation sampling. However, the highest percentage of the improved pasture was found in Likoni and Mombaza. The Tanzania and
the Common varieties exerted lower control in wiregrass, or quite similar as to that of the tillage without sowing. It is concluded that the
Likoni and Mombaza cultivars controlled wiregrass much more. The multivariate analysis allowed establishing the relationship between the
variables, and explaining integrally the results of the renewal. The use of the Likoni and Mombaza varieties as alternative for controlling
wiregrass in improved pastures in state of degradation is recommended.
Key words: grass, wiregrass, varieties, Panicum, Biplot.
Detalles del artículo
Cómo citar
Sardi?as, Y., Varela, M., Padfilla, C., Torres, V., Noda, A., & Fraga, N. (2011). Control of wiregrass (Sporobolus indicus) by planting Panicum maximum varieties. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 45(1). Recuperado a partir de https://cjascience.com/index.php/CJAS/article/view/192
Sección
Ciencia de los pastos y otros cultivos
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista. Bajo esta licencia el autor será libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material
- El licenciador no puede revocar estas libertades mientras cumpla con los términos de la licencia
Bajo las siguientes condiciones:
- Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
- NoComercial — No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que legalmente restrinjan realizar aquello que la licencia permite.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).