Scientific writing and referee professional training

Main Article Content

G. Argota


Several researchers refer the determining function of the scientific writing in the reflexive construction of knowledge (Chun et al. 2022). The scientific writing, as being a complex process because its style and impact of the results (Lu et al. 2019, Chen et al. 2020 and Ante 2022), require clarity and precision in the information, abilities that with frequency are loss when it is not answer to the research question during the writing process (Simón et al. 2020). In consequence, in the scientific field, the feasible, the ethical, the interest, the discoveries and the relevance as criteria to be measure, influence on the decisions of accepting or rejected a paper which is subjected to a checking process for their publication. From this perspective, the referee represents one of the attention centers due to the decision they emit in the publishing process, whose responsibility is to keep the quality and integrity of the scientific literature (Grimaldo et al. 2018 and Libby et al. 2022).

Article Details

How to Cite
Argota, G. (2023). Scientific writing and referee professional training . Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 57. Retrieved from
Letter from Editorial Director


Ante, L. 2022. "The relationship between readability and scientific impact: Evidence from emerging technology discourses". Journal of Informetrics, 16(1): 101252, ISSN: 1875-5879.

Bianchi, F., Grimaldo, F., Bravo, G. & Squazzoni, F. 2018. "The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures". Scientometrics, 116(3): 1401-1420, ISSN: 1588-2861.

Cushman, M. 2023. "How I respond to peer reviewer comments". Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 7(2): 1-3, ISSN: 2475-0379.

Chen, B., Deng, D., Zhong, Z. & Zhang, C. 2020. “Exploring linguistic characteristics of highly browsed and downloaded academic articles”. Scientometrics, 122(3): 1769-1790, ISSN: 1588-2861.

Chun, C.L., Li, C.C., Chin, Y.H., Ching, C.Su. & Ya, L.H. 2022. “Exploring the experience of reflective writing among Taiwanese undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative study”. Journal of Professional Nursing, 40: 105-110, ISSN: 1532-8481.

Edwards, M.A. & Siddhartha, R. 2017. “Academic research in the 21st century: Maintaining scientific integrity in a climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition”. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1): 51-61, ISSN: 1092-8758.

Ellwanger, J.E. & Bogo, C.J.A. 2020. “We need to talk about peer-review – experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 125: 201-205, ISSN: 1878-5921.

Grimaldo, F., Marušić, A. & Squazzoni, F. 2018. “Fragments of peer review: A quantitative analysis of the literature (1969–2015)”. PLoS One, 13(2): 1-14, ISSN: 1932-6203.

King, E.B., Avery, D.R., Helb, M. R. & Cortina, J. M. 2018. “Systematic subjectivity: How subtle biases infect the scholarship review process”. Journal of Management, 44(3): 843-853, ISSN: 1557-1211.

Kovanis, M., Porcher, R., Ravaud, P. & Trinquart, L. 2016. “The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: Strong imbalance in the collective enterprise”. PLoS One, 11(11): e0166387, ISSN: 1932-6203.

Libby, W.M., Sundland, R., Adams, A.M., Faria, I., Feldman, H.A., Gudmundsdottir, H., Marmor, H., Miles, V., Ochoa, V., Ruff, S.M., Tonelli, C., Altieri, M.S., Cannada, L., Dewan, K., Etkin, Y., Marmor, R., Plichta, J.K., Reyna, C., Tatebe., L., Drudi, L.M., Hicks, C.W. 2022. “The art of peer review: Guidelines to become a credible and constructive peer reviewer”. Seminars in Vascular Surgery, 35(4): 470-478, ISSN: 1558-4518.

Lu, C., Bu, Y., Dong, X., Wang, J., Ding, Y., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R., Logan, P. & Zhang, C. 2019. “Analyzing linguistic complexity and scientific impact”. Journal of Informetrics, 13(3): 817-829, ISSN: 1875-5879.

Macdonald, S. 2015. “Emperor’s new clothes. The reinvention of peer review as myth”. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(3): 264-279, ISSN: 1552-6542.

Righi, S. & Takács, K. 2017. “The miracle of peer review and development in science: An agent-based model”. Scientometrics, 113(1): 587-607, ISSN: 1588-2861.

Simón, E.L., Osei, A.M., Wachirad, B.W. & KwanGetting, J.K. 2020. “Getting accepted – Successful writing for scientific publication: a Research Primer for low- and middle-income countries”. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(2): 154-157, ISSN: 2211-4203.

Sobkowicz, P. 2015. “Innovation suppression and clique evolution in peer-review-based, competitive research funding systems: An agent-based model”. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(2): 13, ISSN: 1460-7425.

Teele, D.L. & Thelen, K. 2017. “Gender in the journals: Publication patterns in political science”. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2): 433-447, ISSN: 1537-5935.

Teplitskiy, M., Acuna, D., Elamrani, R.A., Körding, K. & Evans, J. 2018. “The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review”. Research Policy, 47(9): 1825-1841, ISSN: 1873-7625.