Total weight of guinea pigs under feeding conditions with hydroponic green forage of barley, corn husk and concentrate

Main Article Content

Inés Maritza Aguilar Condori
Edwin Ismael Palza Chambe
Noemí Ana María Condor Lazo
DIrene Vilma Limache Ortiz
G. Argota Pérez

Abstract

The total weight of guinea pigs under experimental conditions of feeding with hydroponic green forage of barley, corn husk and concentrate was analyzed. The study was performed in Santa Rosa farm, Tacna (Peru). A total of four treatments were established for the animal feeding T1) hydroponic green forage with free barley + limited concentrate, T2) hydroponic green forage with limited barley + free concentrate, T3) limited corn husk + free concentrate and T4) free corn husk + limited concentrate. The total weight was analyzed when the fourth week finish. The order was: T3=661.33±47.17 g > T2=644.77±17.23 g > T1=499.56±8.34 g > T4=474.33±7.68 g. T3 and T2 showed significant difference (p<0.05) compared to T1 and T4. The total weigh of guinea pigs was higher in the treatments with free concentrate.

Article Details

How to Cite
Aguilar Condori, I. M., Palza Chambe, E. I., Condor Lazo, N. A. M., Limache Ortiz, D. V., & Argota Pérez, G. (2024). Total weight of guinea pigs under feeding conditions with hydroponic green forage of barley, corn husk and concentrate. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 58, https://cu-id.com/1996/v58e04. Retrieved from https://cjascience.com/index.php/CJAS/article/view/1129
Section
Animal Science

References

Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11(1): 1-42, ISSN: 1541-0420. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478.

Ibtissame, E., Rachida, A.A., Khaoula, T. & Abdelaziz, M. 2021. Hydroponic and aquaponic farming: comparative study based on internet of things IoT technologies. Procedia Computer Science, 191: 499–504, ISSN: 1877-0509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.064.

National Research Council. 1995. Nutrient Requeriments of Laboratory Animals; Guinea Pig. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press. 176 p

Narváez, J. & Guerrero, E.M. 2021. Forraje verde hidropónico y organopónico de maíz como suplemento nutricional para ovinos del piedemonte amazónico. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 13(1): 253–266, ISSN: 2145-6097. https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.4535.

Patel, M.K., Kumar, M., Li, W., Luo, Y., Burritt, D.J., Alkan, N. & Tran, L.S.P. 2020. Enhancing salt tolerance of plants: from metabolic reprogramming to exogenous chemical treatments and molecular approaches. Cells, 9: 2492, ISSN: 2073-4409. https://doi.org/10.3390/CELLS9112492.

Pino, V.E. & Chávarri, V.E. 2022. Evidencias de cambio climático en la región hiperárida de la costa sur de Perú, cabecera del desierto de Atacama. Tecnología y Ciencias del Agua, 13(1): 333–376, ISSN: 2007-2422. https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2022-01-08.

Shapiro, S.S. & Wilk, M.B. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3-4): 591–611, ISSN: 1464-3510. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591.

Taboada, M.V.H. 2022. Evaluación de forraje hidropónico de cebada (Hordeum vulgare) en sistemas de alimentación durante el crecimiento del cuy (C. porcellus). Tesis para optar el Título Profesional de Ingeniero Zootecnista. Facultad de Zootecnia, Universidad Agraria La Molina. Lima, Perú. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/5280.

Tellez, V.R., Flores, A.H., Padilla, M.M.A., Ramos, M.L.A. & Rodríguez, P.H. 2022. Efecto de la suplementación de selenio orgánico y vitamina E sobre parámetros productivos del cuy (Cavia porcellus). Revista de Investigación en Ciencias Agronómicas y Veterinarias, 6(18): 436–440, ISSN: 2664-0902. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistaalfa.v6i18.177.

Yanchaliquin, T.J.W. 2022. Forrajes hidropónicos en la alimentación de cuyes. Tesis para optar por grado académico de Ingeniero Zootecnista. Facultad de Ciencias Pecuarias, Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo. Riobamba, Ecuador. http://dspace.espoch.edu.ec/handle/123456789/17088.