<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">cjas</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Cuban J. Agric. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2079-3480</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Ediciones ICA</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">00006</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>ANIMAL SCIENCE</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Nutritional characterization of biofloc developed with water from the Ecuadorian Pacific for growing <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic></article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Ibarra Mayorga</surname>
						<given-names>Eulalia</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1">*</xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Llanes Iglesias</surname>
						<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Rodríguez Sánchez</surname>
						<given-names>Bárbara</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="original"> Docente de la Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Ecuador</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Técnica de Manabí</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Técnica de Manabí</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>Portoviejo</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="EC">Ecuador</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Investigador de la Empresa de Desarrollo de Tecnologías Acuícolas, La Habana, Cuba</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Empresa de Desarrollo de Tecnologías Acuícolas</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>La Habana</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="CU">Cuba</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Mayabeque, Cuba</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Instituto de Ciencia Animal</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto de Ciencia Animal</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<state>Mayabeque</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="CU">Cuba</country>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">
					<label>*</label>Email: <email>tibarra@utm.edu.ec</email>
				</corresp>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>05</day>
				<month>12</month>
				<year>2019</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<month>12</month>
				<year>2019</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>53</volume>
			<issue>4</issue>
			<fpage>395</fpage>
			<lpage>402</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>30</day>
					<month>04</month>
					<year>2019</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>20</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2019</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>The objective of this study was to determine the bromatological and amino acid composition of biofloc generated in the macrocosm tank for growing <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic> with water from the Ecuadorian Pacific. <italic>Thalassisira sp.</italic> microalgae was inoculated to form the macrocosm (1.4 x 10<sup>6</sup> mL / L) and 40 shrimp/m<sup>2</sup> with an average weight of 12.7 ± 1.2 g were placed, as well as commercial food with 35% protein. To guarantee bacterial growth, a C:N ratio of 20:1 was maintained through the contribution of sugar cane molasses and nitrogen from the feed. The biofloc showed high protein levels (36.53%), low lipid contribution (0.97%) and high ash values ​​(33.39%). There was presence of all amino acids, the highest levels were found for leucine, arginine, valine, threonine and phenylalanine. In contrast, tryptophan was the one with the lowest concentration and the lowest chemical score (0.56), resulting in the first limiting amino acid. Likewise, the isoleucine (0.70) and lysine (0.80) scores indicated that they were limiting amino acids of the biofloc that was produced. The index of biofloc essential amino acids was 0.89, which classifies as useful protein material. This study allows to conclude that the biofloc generated with Ecuadorian Pacific water presented an adequate protein quality, in terms of its amino acid composition, chemical score and essential amino acid index, so it can serve as a supplement to the balanced food for growing shrimp with biofloc technology.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords:</title>
				<kwd><italic>flocs</italic></kwd>
				<kwd><italic>white shrimp</italic></kwd>
				<kwd><italic>amino acids</italic></kwd>
				<kwd><italic>bromatological composition</italic></kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="0"/>
				<table-count count="6"/>
				<equation-count count="2"/>
				<ref-count count="40"/>
				<page-count count="8"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
			<p>There are two fundamental premises for the nutrition of water organisms: protein levels and their quality. This last is determined by the composition and availability of amino acids, as well as the level of digestive utilization made by the animal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">NRC 2011</xref>). In addition, it is the main factor that affects growth, water quality and diet costs during shrimp production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tacon <italic>et al.</italic> 2013</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Ponce-Palafox <italic>et al.</italic> 2017</xref>).</p>
			<p>The application of biofloc technology (BFT) provides flocs composed by bacteria, microalgae, protozoa and other organisms, which together with detritus and dead organic matter can increase the availability of food for shrimp, 24 hours a day (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Avnimelech et al. 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuhn <italic>et al</italic>. 2010</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Emerenciano <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>). However, there are factors such as the contribution in protein of the concentrated food, biofloc size, associated microorganisms, fertilizer, type of bioreactor and others, which influence on the quality and quantity of generated flocs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuhn <italic>et al.</italic> 2010</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Ekasari <italic>et al.</italic> 2014</xref>).</p>
			<p>Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the bromatological and amino acid composition of the biofloc of the macrocosm tank, which was generated with water from the Ecuadorian Pacific, for growing <italic>L. vannamei</italic> in an intensive system.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
			<p>In this study, a circular fiberglass tank with a capacity of 3000 L was used for the macrocosm. It had an air diffuser in the center to guarantee oxygenation, continuous movement of water and resuspension of particles.</p>
			<p>The <italic>Thalassisira sp.</italic> microalgae (1.4 x 10<sup>6</sup> mL / L) was inoculated to form the macrocosm, and 40 shrimp/m<sup>2</sup> with an average weight of 12.7 ± 1.2 g were placed. A commercial 35% protein food (Alimentasa) was daily provided. To guarantee bacterial growth, a C: N ratio of 20:1 was maintained through the contribution of sugar cane molasses and nitrogen from feed, as recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Avnimelech (2012)</xref>.</p>
			<p><italic>Bromatological composition of biofloc.</italic> Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE) and ashes were determined to the biofloc contained in the macrocosm tank, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">AOAC (2016)</xref>. Three macrocosm tanks were formed and a water sample (10 L) was taken from each tank for filtration (n = 3). Dried and ground samples were stored at -20 °C its analysis.</p>
			<p><italic>Amino acid profile</italic>. Samples were analyzed by triplicate to determine the amino acid profile by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with sodium ion exchange column and post-column derivatization with ninhydrin in a visible-ultraviolet detector, according to the 994.12 regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">AOAC 2016</xref>). For the quantification of the amino acids, samples were hydrolyzed with 6N hydrochloric acid, for 22 h at 110 oC, according to the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Moore and Stein (1963)</xref>. For tryptophan, samples were hydrolyzed with 4N lithium hydroxide according to methodology described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Lucas and Sotelo (1980)</xref>.</p>
			<p><italic>Chemical score and essential amino acid index (EAAI).</italic> The chemical score was determined as the relation of the value of each essential amino acid (EAA) of the experimental food (biofloc) with the corresponding amino acid value of a pattern protein as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Peñaflorida (1989)</xref>. The recommended essential amino acid requirements for shrimp (<italic>L. vannamei</italic> and <italic>P. monodon</italic>) were used as the standard protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Xie <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Zhou <italic>et al.</italic> 2013</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lin <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>).</p>
			<p>The essential amino acid index (EAAI) evaluates the degree of EAA of the entire sample in relation to the composition or requirements of the EAA of the animal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> 2008</xref>). The formula proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Peñaflorida (1989)</xref> was used to calculate the EAAI:</p>
			<p>
				<disp-formula id="e1">
					<mml:math>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mroot>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mfrac>
										<mml:mrow>
											<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
											<mml:msub>
												<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
												<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
											</mml:msub>
										</mml:mrow>
										<mml:mrow>
											<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
											<mml:msub>
												<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
												<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
											</mml:msub>
										</mml:mrow>
									</mml:mfrac>
									<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
									<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
									<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
									<mml:mfrac>
										<mml:mrow>
											<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
											<mml:msub>
												<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
												<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
											</mml:msub>
										</mml:mrow>
										<mml:mrow>
											<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
											<mml:msub>
												<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
												<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
											</mml:msub>
										</mml:mrow>
									</mml:mfrac>
									<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
									<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
									<mml:mo>…</mml:mo>
									<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
									<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
									<mml:mfrac>
										<mml:mrow>
											<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
											<mml:msub>
												<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
												<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
											</mml:msub>
										</mml:mrow>
										<mml:mrow>
											<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
											<mml:msub>
												<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
												<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
											</mml:msub>
										</mml:mrow>
									</mml:mfrac>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
							</mml:mroot>
						</mml:mrow>
					</mml:math>
				</disp-formula>
			</p>
			<def-list id="d1">
				<title>Where:</title>
				<def-item>
					<term>aa<sub>1</sub></term>
					<def>
						<p>- content of each amino acid in the food;</p>
					</def>
				</def-item>
				<def-item>
					<term>AA<sub>1</sub></term>
					<def>
						<p>- requirement of each amino acid of shrimp,</p>
					</def>
				</def-item>
				<def-item>
					<term>n </term>
					<def>
						<p>- amount of determined essential amino acids.</p>
					</def>
				</def-item>
			</def-list>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
			<title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
			<p><italic>Bromatological composition of biofloc</italic>. The biofloc developed in the macrocosm showed high protein levels (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">table 1</xref>). These values were comparable to those found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wasielesky <italic>et al.</italic> (2006)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Li <italic>et al.</italic> (2018)</xref> although lower than 38.41% of CP, reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Luo <italic>et al.</italic> (2014)</xref> and 43% of CP found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Maicá <italic>et al.</italic> (2011)</xref>. Meanwhile, lipid contribution was low when compared with 2.6% found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tacon <italic>et al.</italic> (2002)</xref> and 7.5% reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Ekasari <italic>et al.</italic> (2014)</xref>.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Proximal composition of the biofloc of the macrocosm tank with white shrimp culture (g / 100g DM, n = 3)</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="justify">Indicator</th>
								<th align="center">Mean</th>
								<th align="center">DS</th>
								<th align="center">VC (%)</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Dry matter </td>
								<td align="center">97.46</td>
								<td align="center">0.74</td>
								<td align="center">0.76</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Crude protein</td>
								<td align="center">36.53</td>
								<td align="center">1.75</td>
								<td align="center">4.79</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Ether extract </td>
								<td align="center">0.97</td>
								<td align="center">1.14</td>
								<td align="center">14.18</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Ashes </td>
								<td align="center">33.39</td>
								<td align="center">2.60</td>
								<td align="center">7.79</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Azim and Little (2008)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Hargreaves (2006)</xref>, dry weight of protein content can vary from 25 to 50%, although the most common is between 30 and 45%. Fat content varies from 0.5 to 10% and the most common range is between 1.0 to 5%. These authors also agreed that biofloc is a good source of vitamins, minerals and has a probiotic effect.</p>
			<p>Reports on CP levels (about 33%) in microbial flocs by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Emerenciano <italic>et al.</italic> (2011)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Suita <italic>et al.</italic> (2015)</xref> were lower than those found in this study, which could be associated with the composition of the microorganism communities present in the biofloc, that are more productive in the waters of the Pacific Ocean (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Maridueña 2004</xref>). On the other hand, the lipid contents were slightly higher compared to those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wasielesky <italic>et al.</italic> (2006)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Emerenciano <italic>et al.</italic> (2011)</xref>, with 0.47 and 0.49%, respectively, and similar to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Suita <italic>et al.</italic> (2015)</xref>, of 1.6%. These authors attribute these lipid levels to the presence of ciliates and microalgae, specifically diatoms that are a source of essential fatty acids and lipids.</p>
			<p>In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Schneider <italic>et al.</italic> (2005)</xref> pointed out that the intake of bioflocs can increase food utilization efficiency by recovering a fraction of the excreted nutrient and retaining nitrogen from aggregate foods between 7 and 13%. In this sense, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Xu <italic>et al.</italic> (2012)</xref> confirmed the contribution of bioflocs in the protein nutrition of <italic>L. vannamei</italic> in culture tanks with BFT. These authors concluded that the formation and development of bioflocs can have an important function as <italic>in situ</italic> supplementary food source and in the improvement of food utilization, protein digestion and retention by the shrimp, contributing even more to improve growth.</p>
			<p>The ash content of this study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">table 1</xref>) reached high values (33.39%) and are similar to other studies, where ash content varied from 7 to 32% of DM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Ekasari <italic>et al.</italic> 2010</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Xu <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>). In this regard, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tacon <italic>et al.</italic> (2002)</xref> stated that the high ash content in bioflocs is probably related to the presence of acid soluble oxides and mixed silicates. In addition, these authors stated that they are a good source of essential minerals and trace elements.</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Maia <italic>et al.</italic> (2016)</xref> reported that, in commercial ponds with TBF, the use of molasses influenced on water quality and on the natural food source (biofloc), with good nutritional composition for shrimp. At the same time, it should be mentioned that sugar cane molasses used for fertilizing favored the increase of ashes since it is rich in this indicator (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Valdivié <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Li <italic>et al.</italic> (2018)</xref> reported that the choice of carbon source is of paramount importance when using biofloc as a food source to reach optimal nutritional indicators in shrimp farming. In this sense, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuhn <italic>et al.</italic> (2010)</xref> stated that molasses is the most used carbon source to produce biofloc. This is because it is a source of simple carbohydrates, easily assimilated by microorganisms that develop in the biofloc and can promote the growth of culture species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Martínez-Córdova <italic>et al.</italic> 2016</xref>). In addition, it is a source of easy acquisition and low costs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Moss <italic>et al.</italic> 2010</xref>).</p>
			<p><italic>Amino acid profile</italic>. The amino acid composition of biofloc that occurred in the macrocosms is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">table 2</xref>. It can be seen that the 12 limiting amino acids were present and at levels according to the literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Ekasari <italic>et al.</italic> 2010</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kuhn <italic>et al.</italic> 2016</xref>). Similarly, the concentration of amino acids found corresponds to the shrimp requirements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Xie <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lin <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). This suggests that this natural food circulating in the culture medium may be a good supplementary source of EAA for white shrimp (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Sabry-Neto <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Amino acid composition of biofloc in the macrocosm tank for growing white shrimp (%, n=3) with waters from the Ecuadorian Pacific</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="justify">Amino acids</th>
								<th align="center">Mean</th>
								<th align="center">SD</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center" colspan="3">Essential amino acids</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Lysine</td>
								<td align="center">1.31</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Methionine</td>
								<td align="center">0.69</td>
								<td align="center">0.15</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Arginine</td>
								<td align="center">1.89</td>
								<td align="center">0.21</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Leucine</td>
								<td align="center">2.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.57</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Valine</td>
								<td align="center">1.68</td>
								<td align="center">0.39</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Threonine</td>
								<td align="center">1.6</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Histidine</td>
								<td align="center">0.86</td>
								<td align="center">0.22</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Isoleucine</td>
								<td align="center">1.22</td>
								<td align="center">0.38</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Phenylalanine </td>
								<td align="center">1.45</td>
								<td align="center">0.18</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Tryptophan</td>
								<td align="center">0.28</td>
								<td align="center">0.12</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center" colspan="3">Non essential amino acids </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Glutamic acid</td>
								<td align="center">3.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.18</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Aspartic acid</td>
								<td align="center">2.61</td>
								<td align="center">0.52</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Alanine</td>
								<td align="center">2.30</td>
								<td align="center">0.37</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Serine</td>
								<td align="center">1.45</td>
								<td align="center">0.29</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Proline</td>
								<td align="center">1.58</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Glycine</td>
								<td align="center">2.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.24</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Tyrosine</td>
								<td align="center">1.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.07</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Cystine</td>
								<td align="center">0.52</td>
								<td align="center">0.17</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Out of the EAA, the highest levels were found for leucine, arginine, valine, threonine and phenylalanine, in contrast to tryptophan, which was the one with the lowest level. These results generally coincide with other studies that analyzed the EAA present in biofloc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> 2008</xref>).</p>
			<p>It is important to state that one of the main reasons that reduce the growth of water organisms in studies where fish meal is partially or totally replaced by alternative protein sources is attributed to an inadequate balance of EAA that lead to a decreased of protein synthesis, essential for animal growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Toledo <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). Therefore, the biofloc that is produced in the culture medium should not affect the productive performance of shrimp when the protein levels in the balanced foods are reduced, given the contribution of essential amino acids that it presents.</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju et al. (2008)</xref> reported that the flocs have a considerable amount of non-amino acid nitrogen as ammonium salts, but also possibly urea, nucleotides and amino sugar, which may arise from the metabolic activity of microorganisms and shrimp. These same authors compared the EAA profile of three biofloc samples, two dominated by microalgae (chlorophytes and diatoms) and the other by bacteria versus the EAA profile of two balanced shrimp feeds, and reported that they were similar. This indicates that protein quality of the organisms present in the biofloc was high. </p>
			<p><italic>Chemical score and essential amino acid index (EAAI).</italic> <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref> shows the chemical score and the EAAI of amino acids present in the biofloc. The chemical score of tryptophan was the lowest (0.56), resulting in the first limiting amino acid, which means that biofloc can only meet approximately half of the shrimp requirement for this amino acid. Similarly, the isoleucine (0.70) and lysine (0.80) scores were found to be second and third limiting amino acids in the macrocosm biofloc sample.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Chemical score and essential amino acid index (EAAI) of the biofloc generated in the macrocosm tank with water from the Ecuadorian Pacific.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="justify">EAA</th>
								<th align="center">Biofloc</th>
								<th align="center">Shrimp requirements</th>
								<th align="center">Chemical score <sup>1</sup></th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Lysine</td>
								<td align="center">1.31</td>
								<td align="center">1.64</td>
								<td align="center">0.80</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Methionine</td>
								<td align="center">0.69</td>
								<td align="center">0.66</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Arginine</td>
								<td align="center">1.89</td>
								<td align="center">1.96</td>
								<td align="center">0.96</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Leucine</td>
								<td align="center">2.17</td>
								<td align="center">2.37</td>
								<td align="center">0.91</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Valine</td>
								<td align="center">1.68</td>
								<td align="center">1.40</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Threonine</td>
								<td align="center">1.6</td>
								<td align="center">1.18</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Histidine</td>
								<td align="center">0.86</td>
								<td align="center">0.80</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Isoleucine</td>
								<td align="center">1.22</td>
								<td align="center">1.73</td>
								<td align="center">0.70</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Phenylalanine </td>
								<td align="center">1.45</td>
								<td align="center">1.40</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Tryptophan</td>
								<td align="center">0.28</td>
								<td align="center">0.50</td>
								<td align="center">0.56</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">EAAI</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">0.89</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p><sup>1</sup>EAA of the sample / EAA of shrimp requirements. An amount of 1.00 was taken as maximum</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Some factors influence on the quality of protein sources, such as amino acid profile (EAA score) and digestibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Toledo <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). The chemical score of EAA evaluates the level of each EAA individually and the value 1.00 indicates that the level of the AEA, particularly within the dietary protein, is identical to the requirement of that essential amino acid of the animal. The lowest value, indicates the first limiting amino acid. On the other hand, the essential amino acid index (EAAI) evaluates the degree of EAA of the entire sample in relation to the composition or requirements of EAA of the animal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Montoya-Martínez <italic>et al.</italic> 2016</xref>).</p>
			<p>The EAAI found in this study was 0.89, which classifies as useful protein material according to Castell and Tiews (1980). This EAAI was equal to the biofloc preferably of bacteria reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> (2008)</xref> and higher than that shown by soy meal (0.87) in <italic>Penaeus monodon</italic>, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Peñaflorida (1989)</xref>. However, they were inferior to bioflocs dominated by microalgae (0.91 and 0.92) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> 2008</xref>). These values ​​suggest that the experimental biofloc can provide a high quality protein source for shrimp growth and may supplement a balanced food.</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> (2008)</xref> stated that an EAAI close or equal to 1.0 indicates that the diet contains an amino acid profile similar to that found throughout the body of the shrimp and it is assumed to be equivalent to its diet requirements. They also refer that, in general, ingredients or feedstuffs with an EAAI of more than 0.90 are considered to be foods of good protein quality or protein materials, with an EAAI of 0.80 are useful, and below 0.70 are inadequate, according to the classification described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Oser (1959)</xref>.</p>
			<p>However, the ability of a food to meet the amino acid needs of an animal depends on the intake rate, bioavailability (digestibility) and its composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Toledo <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). In this regard, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Forster and Dominy (2005)</xref> report that foods with a low EAA score will require their addition, either by other sources of proteins or synthetic amino acid supplements, to obtain an animal yield comparable to that of a diet of high quality. Biofloc, however, arises naturally from the by-products of shrimp farming (metabolic residues, feces and nutrients lixiviated from feed, etc.), providing a renewable source of nutrients for shrimps at no additional cost to fish farmers.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>CONCLUSIONS</title>
			<p>Biofloc generated with water from the Ecuadorian Pacific presented an adequate protein quality, in terms of its amino acid composition, chemical score and index of essential amino acids. Hence, it can be used as a supplement to the balanced feed for shrimp culture with biofloc technology.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ref-list>
			<title>REFERENCES</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC. 2016. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 20th Ed. AOAC International. Suite 300. 2275 Research BLVD Rockville, Maryland 20850-3250. ISBN 0-935584-87-0.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis of AOAC International</source>
					<edition>20th Ed</edition>
					<publisher-name>AOAC International</publisher-name>
					<comment>Suite 300. 2275 Research BLVD</comment>
					<publisher-loc>Rockville, Maryland</publisher-loc>
					<isbn>0-935584-87-0</isbn>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Avnimelech, Y. 2009. Bioﬂoc technology. A practical guidebook. 1th Ed. The World Aquaculture society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States. 182 p.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Avnimelech</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<source>Bioﬂoc technology. A practical guidebook</source>
					<edition>1th Ed</edition>
					<publisher-name>The World Aquaculture society</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>182</fpage>
					<lpage>182</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Avnimelech, Y. 2012. Biofloc technology. A practical guidebook, 2nd Ed. United States, The World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States. 272 p.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Avnimelech</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<source>Biofloc technology. A practical guidebook</source>
					<edition>2nd Ed</edition>
					<publisher-name>The World Aquaculture Society</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>272</fpage>
					<lpage>272</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Azim, M. E., &amp; Little, D. C. 2008. The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: Water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis niloticus</italic>). Aquaculture, 283(1-4), 29-35. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.036.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Azim</surname>
							<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Little</surname>
							<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: Water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>283</volume>
					<issue>1-4</issue>
					<fpage>29</fpage>
					<lpage>35</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.036</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Ekasari, J., Crab, R., &amp; Verstraete, W. 2010. Primary nutritional content of Bio-Flocs cultured with different organic carbon sources and salinity. Hayati Journal of Biosciences, 17(3): 125-130. DOI:10.4308/hjb.17.3.125.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ekasari</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Crab</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Verstraete</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Primary nutritional content of Bio-Flocs cultured with different organic carbon sources and salinity</article-title>
					<source>Hayati Journal of Biosciences</source>
					<volume>17</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>125</fpage>
					<lpage>130</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4308/hjb.17.3.125</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Ekasari, J., Angela, D., Waluyo, S. H., Bachtiar, T., Surawidjaja, E. H., Bossier, P. &amp; De Schryver, P. 2014. The size of biofloc determines the nutritional composition and the nitrogen recovery by aquaculture animals. Aquaculture , 426-427: 105-111. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.01.023.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ekasari</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Angela</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Waluyo</surname>
							<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bachtiar</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Surawidjaja</surname>
							<given-names>E. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bossier</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>De Schryver</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>The size of biofloc determines the nutritional composition and the nitrogen recovery by aquaculture animals</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>426-427</volume>
					<fpage>105</fpage>
					<lpage>111</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.01.023</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Emerenciano, M. G. C., Ballester, E. L. C., Cavalli, R. O., &amp; Wasielesky, W. 2012. Biofloc technology application as a food source in a limited water exchange nursery system for pink shrimp <italic>Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis</italic> (Latreille, 1817). Aquaculture Research, 43(3): 447-457. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02848.x.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Emerenciano</surname>
							<given-names>M. G. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ballester</surname>
							<given-names>E. L. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cavalli</surname>
							<given-names>R. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wasielesky</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Biofloc technology application as a food source in a limited water exchange nursery system for pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817)</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture Research</source>
					<volume>43</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>447</fpage>
					<lpage>457</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02848.x</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Emerenciano, M. G. C., Cuzon, G., Goguenheim, J. &amp; Gaxiola, G. 2011. Floc contribution on spawning performance of blue shrimp <italic>Litopenaeus stylirostris</italic>. Aquaculture Research, 44(1): 75-85. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03012.x.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Emerenciano</surname>
							<given-names>M. G. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cuzon</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Goguenheim</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gaxiola</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Floc contribution on spawning performance of blue shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture Research</source>
					<volume>44</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>75</fpage>
					<lpage>85</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03012.x</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Forster, I. &amp; Dominy, W. 2005. Supplemental amino acids in shrimp feeds. International Aquafeed, 8: 8-15. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Forster</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dominy</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Supplemental amino acids in shrimp feeds</article-title>
					<source>International Aquafeed</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<fpage>8</fpage>
					<lpage>15</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Hargreaves, J. A. 2006. Photosynthetic suspended-growth systems in aquaculture. Aquacultural Engineering, 34(3), 344-363. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.009</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hargreaves</surname>
							<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Photosynthetic suspended-growth systems in aquaculture</article-title>
					<source>Aquacultural Engineering</source>
					<volume>34</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>344</fpage>
					<lpage>363</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.009</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Ju, Z. Y., Forster, I., Conquest, L. &amp; Dominy, W. 2008. Enhanced growth effects on shrimp (<italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>) from inclusion of whole shrimp floc or floc fractions to a formulated diet. Aquaculture Nutrition, 14(6): 533-543. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00559.x.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ju</surname>
							<given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Forster</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Conquest</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dominy</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Enhanced growth effects on shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) from inclusion of whole shrimp floc or floc fractions to a formulated diet</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture Nutrition</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>533</fpage>
					<lpage>543</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00559.x</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Kuhn, D. D., Lawrence, A. L., Boardman, G. D., Patnaik, S., Marsh, L. &amp; Flick, G. J. 2010. Evaluation of two types of bioflocs derived from biological treatment of fish effluent as feed ingredients for Pacific white shrimp, <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>. Aquaculture , 303(1-4), 28-33. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.03.001.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kuhn</surname>
							<given-names>D. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lawrence</surname>
							<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Boardman</surname>
							<given-names>G. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Patnaik</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Marsh</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Flick</surname>
							<given-names>G. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of two types of bioflocs derived from biological treatment of fish effluent as feed ingredients for Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>303</volume>
					<issue>1-4</issue>
					<fpage>28</fpage>
					<lpage>33</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.03.001</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Kuhn, D. D., Lawrence, A. L., Crockett, J. &amp; Taylor, D. 2016. Evaluation of bioflocs derived from confectionary food effluent water as a replacement feed ingredient for fishmeal or soy meal for shrimp. Aquaculture, 454, 66-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.12.009.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kuhn</surname>
							<given-names>D. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lawrence</surname>
							<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Crockett</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Taylor</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of bioflocs derived from confectionary food effluent water as a replacement feed ingredient for fishmeal or soy meal for shrimp</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>454</volume>
					<fpage>66</fpage>
					<lpage>71</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.12.009</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Li, J., Liu, G., Li, Ch., Deng, Y., Tadda, M. A., Lan, L., Zhu, S. &amp; Liu, D. 2018. Effects of different solid carbon sources on water quality, biofloc quality and gut microbiota of Nile tilapia (<italic>Oreochromis niloticus</italic>) larvae. Aquaculture , 495:919-931. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.078.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>Ch.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Deng</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tadda</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lan</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhu</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Effects of different solid carbon sources on water quality, biofloc quality and gut microbiota of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) larvae</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>495</volume>
					<fpage>919</fpage>
					<lpage>931</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.078</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Lin, H., Chen,Y., Niu, J., Zhou, C., Huang, Z., Du, Q. &amp; Zhang, J. 2015. Dietary methionine requirements of Pacific white shrimp <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>, of three different sises. Journal of Aquaculture -Bamidgeh, IJA_6x.2015.1163. 10 p.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lin</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Niu</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Huang</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Du</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Dietary methionine requirements of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei, of three different sises</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Aquaculture -Bamidgeh</source>
					<comment>IJA_6x.2015.1163</comment>
					<fpage>10</fpage>
					<lpage>10</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Lucas, B. &amp; Sotelo, A. 1980. Effect of different alkalies, temperature and hydrolysis time on tryptophan determination of pure proteins and of foods. Anal. Biochem., 109:192.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lucas</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sotelo</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1980</year>
					<article-title>Effect of different alkalies, temperature and hydrolysis time on tryptophan determination of pure proteins and of foods</article-title>
					<source>Anal. Biochem.</source>
					<volume>109</volume>
					<fpage>192</fpage>
					<lpage>192</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Luo, G., Gao, Q., Wang, C., Liu, W., Sun, D., Li, L. &amp; Tan, H. 2014. Growth, digestive activity, welfare, and partial cost-effectiveness of genetically improved farmed tilapia <italic>(Oreochromis niloticus</italic>) cultured in a recirculating aquaculture system and an indoor biofloc system. Aquaculture, 422-423, 1-7. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.11.023.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Luo</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gao</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sun</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tan</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Growth, digestive activity, welfare, and partial cost-effectiveness of genetically improved farmed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cultured in a recirculating aquaculture system and an indoor biofloc system</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>422-423</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>7</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.11.023</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Maia, E. de P., Alves-Modesto, G., Brito, L. O., Olivera-Galvez, A. &amp; Vasconcelos-Gesteira, T. C. 2016. Intensive culture system of <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic> in commercial ponds with zero water exchange and addition of molasses and probiotics. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía, 51(1): 61-67. DOI: 10.4067/s0718-19572016000100006 .</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Maia</surname>
							<given-names>E. de P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alves-Modesto</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brito</surname>
							<given-names>L. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Olivera-Galvez</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vasconcelos-Gesteira</surname>
							<given-names>T. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Intensive culture system of Litopenaeus vannamei in commercial ponds with zero water exchange and addition of molasses and probiotics</article-title>
					<source>Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía</source>
					<volume>51</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>61</fpage>
					<lpage>67</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4067/s0718-19572016000100006</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Maicá, P. F., de Borba, M. R., &amp; Wasielesky Jr., W. 2011. Effect of low salinity on microbial floc composition and performance of <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone</italic>) juveniles reared in a zero-water-exchange super-intensive system. Aquaculture Research, 43(3): 361-370. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02838.x.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Maicá</surname>
							<given-names>P. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>de Borba</surname>
							<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wasielesky</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Effect of low salinity on microbial floc composition and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) juveniles reared in a zero-water-exchange super-intensive system</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture Research</source>
					<volume>43</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>361</fpage>
					<lpage>370</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02838.x</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Maridueña, D. 2004. Oceanografía física básica. 1ra edición. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales. Universidad de Guayaquil. p. 201.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Maridueña</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<source>Oceanografía física básica</source>
					<edition>1ra edición</edition>
					<publisher-name>Facultad de Ciencias Naturales. Universidad de Guayaquil</publisher-name>
					<fpage>201</fpage>
					<lpage>201</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Martínez-Córdova, L. R., Martínez-Porchas, M., Emerenciano, M. G. C., Miranda-Baeza, A. &amp; Gollas-Galván, T. 2016. From microbes to fish the next revolution in food production. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 37(3), 287-295. DOI:10.3109/07388551.2016.1144043.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Martínez-Córdova</surname>
							<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martínez-Porchas</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Emerenciano</surname>
							<given-names>M. G. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Miranda-Baeza</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gollas-Galván</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>From microbes to fish the next revolution in food production</article-title>
					<source>Critical Reviews in Biotechnology</source>
					<volume>37</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>287</fpage>
					<lpage>295</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3109/07388551.2016.1144043</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Montoya-Martínez, C., Nolasco-Soria, H., Carrillo-Farnés, O., Civera-Cerecedo, R., Álvarez-González, C. &amp; Vega-Villasante, F. 2016. Chemical score of different protein sources to four <italic>Macrobrachium</italic> species. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 44(4): 835-844. DOI: 10.3856/vol44-issue4-fulltext-19</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Montoya-Martínez</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nolasco-Soria</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Carrillo-Farnés</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Civera-Cerecedo</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Álvarez-González</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vega-Villasante</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Chemical score of different protein sources to four Macrobrachium species</article-title>
					<source>Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res.</source>
					<volume>44</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>835</fpage>
					<lpage>844</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3856/vol44-issue4-fulltext-19</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Moore, S. &amp; Stein, W. H. 1963. Chromatographic determination of amino acids by the use of automatic recording equipment. In “Methods in enzymology. Vol. 6. Colowick, S. P. and Munro, N. O. Academic Press, New York.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Moore</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stein</surname>
							<given-names>W. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1963</year>
					<chapter-title>Chromatographic determination of amino acids by the use of automatic recording equipment</chapter-title>
					<source>Methods in enzymology</source>
					<volume>6</volume>
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Colowick</surname>
							<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Munro</surname>
							<given-names>N. O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Moss, S. M., Moss, D. R., Otoshi, C. A. &amp; Arce, S. M. 2010. An integrated approach to sustainable shrimp farming. Asian Fisheries Science 23 (4):591-605. ISSN 0116-6514</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Moss</surname>
							<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Moss</surname>
							<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Otoshi</surname>
							<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arce</surname>
							<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>An integrated approach to sustainable shrimp farming</article-title>
					<source>Asian Fisheries Science</source>
					<volume>23</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>591</fpage>
					<lpage>605</lpage>
					<issn>0116-6514</issn>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>NRC. National Research Council. 2011. Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. Ed. National Academies Press, Washington. p. 392. ISBN: 9780309163385.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>NRC. National Research Council</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<source>Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp</source>
					<publisher-name>National Academies Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>392</fpage>
					<lpage>392</lpage>
					<isbn>9780309163385</isbn>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Oser, B. L. 1959. An integrated essential amino acid index for predicting the biological value of proteins. In: Protein and aminoacid nutrition (ed. by A.A. Albanese). pp. 281-295. Academic Press, NewYork, NY, USA</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Oser</surname>
							<given-names>B. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1959</year>
					<chapter-title>An integrated essential amino acid index for predicting the biological value of proteins</chapter-title>
					<source>Protein and aminoacid nutrition</source>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<name>
							<surname>Albanese</surname>
							<given-names>A.A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<fpage>281</fpage>
					<lpage>295</lpage>
					<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>NewYork, NY, USA</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Peñaflorida, V. D. 1989. An evaluation of indigenous protein sources as potential component in the diet formulation for tiger prawn, <italic>Penaeus monodon</italic>, using essential amino acid index (EAAI). Aquaculture , 83(3-4): 319-330. DOI: 10.1016/0044-8486(89)90043-4.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Peñaflorida</surname>
							<given-names>V. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1989</year>
					<article-title>An evaluation of indigenous protein sources as potential component in the diet formulation for tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon, using essential amino acid index (EAAI)</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>83</volume>
					<issue>3-4</issue>
					<fpage>319</fpage>
					<lpage>330</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0044-8486(89)90043-4</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Ponce-Palafox, J. T., Esparza-Leal, H., Arredondo-Figueroa, J. L., Martinez-Palacios, C. A. &amp; Ross, L. G. 2017. The effect of protein and lipid level on the specific dynamic action and post-prandial nitrogen excretion in subadult of white shrimp <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía. 52(1): 131-141. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-19572017000100011.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ponce-Palafox</surname>
							<given-names>J. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Esparza-Leal</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arredondo-Figueroa</surname>
							<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martinez-Palacios</surname>
							<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ross</surname>
							<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>The effect of protein and lipid level on the specific dynamic action and post-prandial nitrogen excretion in subadult of white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei</article-title>
					<source>Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía</source>
					<volume>52</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>131</fpage>
					<lpage>141</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4067/S0718-19572017000100011</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Sabry-Neto, H., Santaella, S. T. &amp; Nunes, A. J. P. 2015. Bioavailability of crude protein and lipid from biofloc meals produced in an activated sludge system for white shrimp, <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 44(8): 269-275. DOI:10.1590/s1806-92902015000800001.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sabry-Neto</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Santaella</surname>
							<given-names>S. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nunes</surname>
							<given-names>A. J. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Bioavailability of crude protein and lipid from biofloc meals produced in an activated sludge system for white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>44</volume>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>269</fpage>
					<lpage>275</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/s1806-92902015000800001</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Schneider, O., Sereti, V., Eding, E. H., &amp; Verreth, J. A. J. 2005. Analysis of nutrient flows in integrated intensive aquaculture systems. Aquacultural Engineering , 32(3-4): 379-401. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaeng.2004.09.001</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Schneider</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sereti</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Eding</surname>
							<given-names>E. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Verreth</surname>
							<given-names>J. A. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Analysis of nutrient flows in integrated intensive aquaculture systems</article-title>
					<source>Aquacultural Engineering</source>
					<volume>32</volume>
					<issue>3-4</issue>
					<fpage>379</fpage>
					<lpage>401</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaeng.2004.09.001</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Suita, S. M., Ballester, E. L. C., Abreu, P. C. &amp; Wasielesky, Jr. W. 2015. Dextrose as carbon source in the culture of <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic> (Boone, 1931) in a zero exchange system. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 43(3): 526-533. DOI: 10.3856/vol43-issue3-fulltext-13.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Suita</surname>
							<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ballester</surname>
							<given-names>E. L. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Abreu</surname>
							<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wasielesky</surname>
							<given-names>Jr. W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Dextrose as carbon source in the culture of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in a zero exchange system</article-title>
					<source>Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res.</source>
					<volume>43</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>526</fpage>
					<lpage>533</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3856/vol43-issue3-fulltext-13</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>Tacon, A. J. G., Cody, J. J., Conquest, L. D., Divakaran, S., Forster, I. P. &amp; Decamp, O. E. 2002. Effect of culture system on the nutrition and growth performance of Pacific White shrimp <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic> (Boone) fed different diets. Aquaculture Nutrition 8, 121- 131. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2095.2002.00199.x.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tacon</surname>
							<given-names>A. J. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cody</surname>
							<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Conquest</surname>
							<given-names>L. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Divakaran</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Forster</surname>
							<given-names>I. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Decamp</surname>
							<given-names>O. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<article-title>Effect of culture system on the nutrition and growth performance of Pacific White shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) fed different diets</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture Nutrition</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<fpage>121</fpage>
					<lpage> 131</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2095.2002.00199.x</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Tacon, A. G. J., Jory, D. &amp; Nunes, A. 2013. Shrimp feed management: issues and perspectives. <italic>In</italic> M.R., Hasan and M.B., New, eds. On-farm feeding and feed management in aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 583. Rome, FAO. pp. 481-488.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tacon</surname>
							<given-names>A. G. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jory</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nunes</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<chapter-title>Shrimp feed management: issues and perspectives</chapter-title>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<name>
							<surname>M.R.</surname>
							<given-names>Hasan</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>M.B.</surname>
							<given-names>New</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<source>On-farm feeding and feed management in aquaculture</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="other">FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 583</pub-id>
					<publisher-name>Rome</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>FAO</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>481</fpage>
					<lpage>488</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>Toledo, J., Llanes, J. &amp; Romero, C. 2015. Nutrición y alimentación de peces tropicales. AcuaCUBA 17 (1): 5-29. ISSN 1608-0467/ RNPS 0373.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Toledo</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Llanes</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Romero</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Nutrición y alimentación de peces tropicales</article-title>
					<source>AcuaCUBA</source>
					<volume>17</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>5</fpage>
					<lpage>29</lpage>
					<issn>1608-0467</issn>
					<comment>RNPS 0373</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation>Valdivié, M., Bernal, H., Morales, H., Gutiérrez, E., Rodríguez, B., Mora, L., González, R., Cisneros, M., Rodríguez, R., LaO, A.L., Cerillo, M.A. &amp; Júarez, A. 2012. Alimentación de aves, cerdos y conejos con yuca, batata, banano, arroz, caña, DDGS y amaranto. First edition. EDICA: 978-959-7171-20-1.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Valdivié</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bernal</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Morales</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gutiérrez</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rodríguez</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mora</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>González</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cisneros</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rodríguez</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>LaO</surname>
							<given-names>A.L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cerillo</surname>
							<given-names>M.A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Júarez</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<source>Alimentación de aves, cerdos y conejos con yuca, batata, banano, arroz, caña, DDGS y amaranto</source>
					<edition>First edition</edition>
					<publisher-name>EDICA</publisher-name>
					<isbn>978-959-7171-20-1</isbn>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation>Wasielesky, W., Atwood, H., Stokes, A., &amp; Browdy, C. L. 2006. Effect of natural production in a zero exchange suspended microbial floc based super-intensive culture system for white shrimp <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>. Aquaculture, 258(1-4), 396-403. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.04.030</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wasielesky</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Atwood</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stokes</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Browdy</surname>
							<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Effect of natural production in a zero exchange suspended microbial floc based super-intensive culture system for white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>258</volume>
					<issue>1-4</issue>
					<fpage>396</fpage>
					<lpage>403</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.04.030</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation>Xie, F. J., Zeng, W. P., Zhou, Q. C., Wang, H. L., Wang, T., Zheng, C. Q. &amp; Wang, Y. L. 2012. Dietary lysine requirement of juvenile Pacific white shrimp, <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>. Aquaculture, 358-359: 116-121. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.06.027.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xie</surname>
							<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zeng</surname>
							<given-names>W. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>Q. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>H. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zheng</surname>
							<given-names>C. Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Dietary lysine requirement of juvenile Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>358-359</volume>
					<fpage>116</fpage>
					<lpage>121</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.06.027</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation>Xu, W. J., Pan, L. Q., Zhao, D. H. &amp; Huang, J. 2012. Preliminary investigation into the contribution of bioflocs on protein nutrition of <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic> fed with different dietary protein levels in zero-water exchange culture tanks. Aquaculture, 350-353: 147-153. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.003.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pan</surname>
							<given-names>L. Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>D. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Huang</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Preliminary investigation into the contribution of bioflocs on protein nutrition of Litopenaeus vannamei fed with different dietary protein levels in zero-water exchange culture tanks</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>350-353</volume>
					<fpage>147</fpage>
					<lpage>153</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.04.003</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation>Zhou, Q. C., Wang, Y. L., Wang, H. L. &amp; Tan, B. P. 2013. Dietary threonine requirements of juvenile Pacific white shrimp, <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>. Aquaculture, 392: 142-147. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.01.026. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>Q. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>H. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tan</surname>
							<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Dietary threonine requirements of juvenile Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>392</volume>
					<fpage>142</fpage>
					<lpage>147</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.01.026</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation>Zhou, Q. C., Zeng, W. P., Wang, H. L., Wang, T., Wang, Y. L. &amp; Xie, F. J. 2012. Dietary arginine requirement of juvenile Pacific white shrimp, <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic>. Aquaculture , 364-365: 252-258. DOI:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.08.020.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>Q. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zeng</surname>
							<given-names>W. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>H. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xie</surname>
							<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Dietary arginine requirement of juvenile Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei</article-title>
					<source>Aquaculture</source>
					<volume>364-365</volume>
					<fpage>252</fpage>
					<lpage>258</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.08.020</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
	<sub-article article-type="translation" id="s1" xml:lang="es">
		<front-stub>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>CIENCIA ANIMAL</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Caracterización nutricional del biofloc desarrollado con agua del Pacífico ecuatoriano para el cultivo de <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei.</italic></article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Ibarra Mayorga</surname>
						<given-names>Eulalia</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>1</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c2">*</xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Llanes Iglesias</surname>
						<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Rodríguez Sánchez</surname>
						<given-names>Bárbara</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff4">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="original"> Docente de la Universidad Técnica de Manabí, Portoviejo, Ecuador</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff5">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Investigador de la Empresa de Desarrollo de Tecnologías Acuícolas, La Habana, Cuba</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff6">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Instituto de Ciencia Animal, Mayabeque, Cuba</institution>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c2">
					<label>*</label>Email: <email>tibarra@utm.edu.ec</email>
				</corresp>
			</author-notes>
			<abstract>
				<title>RESUMEN</title>
				<p>El trabajo tuvo como objetivo determinar la composición bromatológica y aminoacídica del biofloc generado en el tanque macrocosmos para el cultivo de <italic>Litopenaeus vannamei</italic> con agua del Pacífico ecuatoriano. Para la conformación del macrocosmos se inoculó la microalga <italic>Thalassisira sp.</italic> (1.4 x 10<sup>6</sup> mL/L) y se colocaron 40 camarones/m<sup>2</sup> con peso promedio de 12.7 ± 1.2 g y alimento comercial con 35 % de proteína. Para garantizar el crecimiento bacteriano se mantuvo una relación C: N de 20:1 mediante el aporte de melaza de caña y el nitrógeno procedente del pienso. El biofloc que se generó presentó altos niveles de proteína (36.53 %), bajo aporte en lípidos (0.97 %) y altos valores de cenizas (33.39 %). Hubo presencia de todos los aminoácidos, los mayores tenores se encontraron para la leucina, arginina, valina, treonina y fenilalanina. Por el contrario del triptófano que fue el que presentó la menor concentración y el menor score químico (0.56) resultando el primer aminoácido limitante. De igual forma, los scores de la isoleucina (0.70) y la lisina (0.80) indicaron que fueron aminoácidos limitantes del biofloc que se produjo. El índice de aminoácidos esenciales del biofloc fue de 0.89, lo que clasifica como material proteico útil. Este estudio permite concluir que el biofloc que se generó con agua del Pacífico ecuatoriano presentó una adecuada calidad proteica, en cuanto a su composición aminoacídica, score químico e índice de aminoácidos esenciales de ahí, que puede servir de suplemento al alimento balanceado para el cultivo de camarón con tecnología biofloc.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<title>Palabras clave:</title>
				<kwd><italic>flóculos</italic></kwd>
				<kwd><italic>camarón blanco</italic></kwd>
				<kwd><italic>aminoácidos</italic></kwd>
				<kwd><italic>composición bromatológica</italic></kwd>
			</kwd-group>
		</front-stub>
		<body>
			<sec sec-type="intro">
				<title>INTRODUCCIÓN</title>
				<p>Existen dos premisas fundamentales para la nutrición de organismos acuáticos: los niveles de proteína y su calidad. Esta se determina por la composición y disponibilidad de los aminoácidos, así como el nivel de utilización digestiva que el animal realice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">NRC 2011</xref>). Además, es el factor principal que influye en el crecimiento, en la calidad del agua y en los costos de las dietas durante la producción de camarón (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tacon <italic>et al.</italic> 2013</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Ponce-Palafox <italic>et al</italic>. 2017</xref>). </p>
				<p>La aplicación de la tecnología biofloc (TBF) proporciona flóculos formados por bacterias, microalgas, protozoos y otros organismos, que unidos con detritus y materia orgánica muerta pueden incrementar la disponibilidad de alimento para el camarón las 24 h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Avnimelech y Kochba2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuhn <italic>et al</italic>. 2010</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Emerenciano <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>). No obstante, hay factores como el aporte en proteína del alimento concentrado, el tamaño del biofloc, los microorganismos asociados, el fertilizante, tipo de bioreactor y otros, que influyen en la calidad y cantidad de flóculos que se generan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuhn <italic>et al</italic>. 2010</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Ekasari <italic>et al</italic>. 2014</xref>). </p>
				<p>Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este trabajo consistió en determinar la composición bromatológica y aminoacídica del biofloc del tanque macrocosmos, que se generó con agua del Pacífico ecuatoriano para la alimentación de <italic>L. vannamei</italic> en sistema intensivo.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
				<title>MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS</title>
				<p>En este estudio se utilizó un tanque de fibra de vidrio circular de 3000 L de capacidad para el macrocosmos. Este contó con un difusor de aire en el centro para garantizar la oxigenación, el movimiento continuo del agua y la resuspensión de partículas. </p>
				<p>Para la conformación del macrocosmos se inoculó la microalga <italic>Thalassisira sp.</italic> (1.4 x 10<sup>6</sup> mL/L) y se colocaron 40 camarones/m<sup>2</sup> con peso promedio de 12.7 ± 1.2 g. Diariamente se suministró un alimento comercial de 35 % de proteína (Alimentasa). Para garantizar el crecimiento bacteriano se mantuvo una relación C: N de 20:1 mediante el aporte de melaza de caña y el nitrógeno procedente del pienso según lo recomendado por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Avnimelech (2012)</xref>.</p>
				<p><italic>Composición bromatológica del biofloc</italic>
 <bold>.</bold> Se determinó materia seca (MS), proteína bruta (PB), extracto etéreo (EE) y cenizas al biofloc contenido en el tanque macrocosmos según AOAC (2016). Se conformaron tres tanques macrocosmos y se tomó una muestra de agua (10 L) de cada tanque para su filtración (n=3). Las muestras secas y molidas se almacenaron a -20 0C para su análisis.</p>
				<p><italic>Perfil de aminoácidos.</italic> Las muestras por triplicado se analizaron para determinar el perfil de aminoácidos por cromatografía líquida de alta resolución (HPLC) con columna de intercambio iónico de sodio y derivatización post-columna con ninhidrina en un detector ultravioleta-visible según la norma 994.12 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">AOAC 2016</xref>). Para la cuantificación de los aminoácidos, las muestras se hidrolizaron con ácido clorhídrico 6N, por 22 h a 110 oC según el método descrito por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Moore y Stein (1963)</xref>. Para el triptófano, las muestras se hidrolizaron con hidróxido de litio 4N según metodología descrita por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Lucas y Sotelo (1980)</xref>. </p>
				<p><italic>“Score” químico e índice de aminoácidos esenciales (EAAIE)</italic>
 <bold>.</bold> El “score” químico se determinó como la relación del valor de cada aminoácido esencial (AAE) del alimento experimental (biofloc) con el valor del aminoácido correspondiente de una proteína patrón según lo descrito por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Peñaflorida (1989)</xref>. Se utilizó, como proteína patrón, los requerimientos de aminoácidos esenciales recomendados para el camarón (<italic>L. vannamei</italic> y <italic>P. monodon)</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Xie <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Zhou <italic>et al.</italic> 2013</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lin <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). </p>
				<p>El índice de aminoácido esencial (EAAI) evalúa el grado de AAE de la muestra entera con relación a la composición o requerimientos de AAE del animal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al</italic>. 2008</xref>). Para calcular el EAAI se empleó la fórmula propuesta por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Peñaflorida (1989)</xref>: </p>
				<p>
					<disp-formula id="e2">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
								<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
								<mml:mroot>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mfrac>
											<mml:mrow>
												<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
												<mml:msub>
													<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
													<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
												</mml:msub>
											</mml:mrow>
											<mml:mrow>
												<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
												<mml:msub>
													<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
													<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
												</mml:msub>
											</mml:mrow>
										</mml:mfrac>
										<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
										<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
										<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
										<mml:mfrac>
											<mml:mrow>
												<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
												<mml:msub>
													<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
													<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
												</mml:msub>
											</mml:mrow>
											<mml:mrow>
												<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
												<mml:msub>
													<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
													<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
												</mml:msub>
											</mml:mrow>
										</mml:mfrac>
										<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
										<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
										<mml:mo>…</mml:mo>
										<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
										<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
										<mml:mfrac>
											<mml:mrow>
												<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
												<mml:msub>
													<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
													<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
												</mml:msub>
											</mml:mrow>
											<mml:mrow>
												<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
												<mml:msub>
													<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
													<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
												</mml:msub>
											</mml:mrow>
										</mml:mfrac>
									</mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
								</mml:mroot>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:math>
					</disp-formula>
				</p>
				<def-list id="d2">
					<title>Donde:</title>
					<def-item>
						<term>aa<sub>1</sub></term>
						<def>
							<p>- contenido de cada aminoácido en el alimento;</p>
						</def>
					</def-item>
					<def-item>
						<term>AA<sub>1</sub></term>
						<def>
							<p>- requerimiento de cada aminoácido del camarón,</p>
						</def>
					</def-item>
					<def-item>
						<term>n </term>
						<def>
							<p>- cantidad de aminoácidos esenciales determinados.</p>
						</def>
					</def-item>
				</def-list>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
				<title>RESULTADOS Y DISCUSIÓN</title>
				<p>El biofloc que se desarrolló en el macrocosmos presentó altos niveles de proteína (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">tabla 1</xref>). Valores comparables con los encontrados por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wasielesky <italic>et al.</italic> (2006)</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Li <italic>et al.</italic> (2018)</xref> aunque inferiores a 38.41 % PB informado por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Luo <italic>et al.</italic> (2014)</xref> y 43 % PB, hallado por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Maicá <italic>et al.</italic> (2011)</xref>. En tanto, el aporte en lípidos fue bajo al comparar con 2.6 % encontrado por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tacon <italic>et al.</italic> (2002)</xref> y 7.5 % informado por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Ekasari <italic>et al.</italic> (2014)</xref>. </p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t4">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Proximal composition of the biofloc of the macrocosm tank with white shrimp culture (g / 100g DM, n = 3)</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="justify">Indicator</th>
									<th align="center">Mean</th>
									<th align="center">DS</th>
									<th align="center">VC (%)</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Dry matter </td>
									<td align="center">97.46</td>
									<td align="center">0.74</td>
									<td align="center">0.76</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Crude protein</td>
									<td align="center">36.53</td>
									<td align="center">1.75</td>
									<td align="center">4.79</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Ether extract </td>
									<td align="center">0.97</td>
									<td align="center">1.14</td>
									<td align="center">14.18</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Ashes </td>
									<td align="center">33.39</td>
									<td align="center">2.60</td>
									<td align="center">7.79</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>Según <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Azim y Little (2008)</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Hargreaves (2006)</xref> el peso seco del contenido de proteína puede variar de 25 a 50 %, aunque lo más común es entre 30 y 45 %. El contenido de grasas varía de 0.5 a 10 % y el rango más común se encuentra entre 1.0 a 5 %. Estos autores también coincidieron que el biofloc es una buena fuente de vitaminas, minerales y tiene efecto probiótico. </p>
				<p>Reportes sobre niveles de PB (alrededor de 33 %) en flóculos microbianos por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Emerenciano <italic>et al.</italic> (2011)</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Suita <italic>et al</italic>. (2015)</xref> fueron inferiores a los encontrados en este estudio, lo que se pudiera asociar a la composición de las comunidades de microorganismos presentes en el biofloc, que en las aguas del océano Pacífico son de mayor productividad (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Maridueña 2004</xref>). Por otra parte, los contenidos de lípidos fueron ligeramente superiores en comparación con los reportados por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wasielesky <italic>et al.</italic> (2006)</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Emerenciano <italic>et al.</italic> (2011)</xref> (0.47 y 0.49 %, respectivamente) y similares a los de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Suita <italic>et al.</italic> (2015)</xref> de 1.6 %. Estos autores atribuyen estos niveles de lípidos a la presencia de ciliados y microalgas, específicamente diatomeas que son fuente de lípidos y ácidos grasos esenciales. </p>
				<p>Además, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Schneider <italic>et al.</italic> (2005)</xref> señalaron que el consumo de bioflocs puede aumentar la eficiencia de utilización de los alimentos mediante la recuperación de una fracción del nutriente excretado y la retención de nitrógeno de los alimentos agregados entre un 7 y 13%. En este sentido, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Xu <italic>et al.</italic> (2012)</xref> confirmaron la contribución de los bioflocs en la nutrición proteica de <italic>L. vannamei</italic> en tanques de cultivo con TBF. Concluyeron que la formación y el desarrollo de bioflocs puede desempeñar un roll importante como una fuente de alimento suplementario in situ y en la mejora de la utilización del alimento, la digestión de proteínas y la retención por el camarón, contribuyendo aún más en mejorar el crecimiento.</p>
				<p>El contenido de cenizas en este estudio (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">tabla 1</xref>) alcanzó valores altos (33.39 %) y se corresponden con otros estudios, donde el contenido de cenizas varió de 7 a 32 % de MS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Ekasari <italic>et al</italic>. 2010</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Xu <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>). Al respecto, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tacon <italic>et al</italic>. (2002)</xref> plantearon que el alto contenido de cenizas en los bioflocs probablemente se relaciona con la presencia de óxidos solubles en ácido y silicatos mixtos. Además, plantearon que son una buena fuente de minerales esenciales y elementos traza.</p>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Maia <italic>et al.</italic> (2016)</xref> informaron que en estanques comerciales con TBF el uso de melaza influyó en la calidad del agua y en la fuente natural de alimento (biofloc) con buena composición nutricional para el camarón. A su vez podemos atribuir que la melaza de caña que se utilizó para fertilizar favoreció el incremento de cenizas ya que es rica en esta (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Valdivié <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Li <italic>et al.</italic> (2018)</xref> refieren que la elección de la fuente de carbono es de importancia primordial al emplear el biofloc como fuente de alimento para alcanzar indicadores nutricionales óptimos en el cultivo de camarón. En este sentido, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuhn <italic>et al.</italic> (2010)</xref> plantearon que la melaza es la fuente de carbono más utilizada para producir biofloc. Esto se debe a que es una fuente de carbohidratos simples, de fácil asimilación por los microorganismos que se desarrollan en el biofloc y puede promover el crecimiento de especies de cultivo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Martínez-Córdova <italic>et al</italic>. 2016</xref>). Además, es una fuente de fácil adquisición y bajos costos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Moss <italic>et al</italic>. 2010</xref>). </p>
				<p><italic>Perfil de aminoácidos</italic>
 <bold>.</bold> La composición en aminoácidos del biofloc que se produjo en los macrocosmos se presenta en la <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">tabla 2</xref>. Se puede observar que estuvieron presente los 12 aminoácidos limitantes y en niveles acorde a la literatura (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Ekasari <italic>et al.</italic> 2010</xref> y <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kuhn <italic>et al.</italic> 2016</xref>). De igual forma, la concentración de aminoácidos encontrados se corresponde con los requerimientos del camarón (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Xie <italic>et al.</italic> 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lin <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). Lo que sugiere que este alimento natural circulante en el medio de cultivo puede ser buena fuente suplementaria de AAE para el camarón blanco (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Sabry-Neto <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). </p>
				<p>De los AAE, los mayores tenores se encontraron para la leucina, arginina, valina, treonina y fenilalanina, por el contrario del triptófano que fue el que presentó menor nivel. Estos resultados de forma general coinciden con otros estudios que analizaron los AAE presentes en biofloc (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> 2008</xref>). </p>
				<p>Es importante anotar, que una de las principales razones que reducen el crecimiento de organismos acuáticos en estudios donde se sustituye parcial o totalmente la harina de pescado por fuentes alternativas de proteína se atribuyen a un inadecuado equilibrio de AAE que conducen a la disminución de la síntesis de proteína, esencial para el crecimiento del animal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Toledo <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). Por lo tanto, el biofloc que se produce en el medio de cultivo no debe afectar el desempeño productivo del camarón cuando se disminuyen los niveles de proteína en los alimentos balanceados dado al aporte de aminoácidos esenciales que presenta. </p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t5">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Amino acid composition of biofloc in the macrocosm tank for growing white shrimp (%, n=3) with waters from the Ecuadorian Pacific</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="justify">Amino acids</th>
									<th align="center">Mean</th>
									<th align="center">SD</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th align="center" colspan="3">Essential amino acids</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Lysine</td>
									<td align="center">1.31</td>
									<td align="center">0.10</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Methionine</td>
									<td align="center">0.69</td>
									<td align="center">0.15</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Arginine</td>
									<td align="center">1.89</td>
									<td align="center">0.21</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Leucine</td>
									<td align="center">2.17</td>
									<td align="center">0.57</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Valine</td>
									<td align="center">1.68</td>
									<td align="center">0.39</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Threonine</td>
									<td align="center">1.6</td>
									<td align="center">0.02</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Histidine</td>
									<td align="center">0.86</td>
									<td align="center">0.22</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Isoleucine</td>
									<td align="center">1.22</td>
									<td align="center">0.38</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Phenylalanine </td>
									<td align="center">1.45</td>
									<td align="center">0.18</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Tryptophan</td>
									<td align="center">0.28</td>
									<td align="center">0.12</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" colspan="3">Non essential amino acids </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Glutamic acid</td>
									<td align="center">3.08</td>
									<td align="center">0.18</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Aspartic acid</td>
									<td align="center">2.61</td>
									<td align="center">0.52</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Alanine</td>
									<td align="center">2.30</td>
									<td align="center">0.37</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Serine</td>
									<td align="center">1.45</td>
									<td align="center">0.29</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Proline</td>
									<td align="center">1.58</td>
									<td align="center">0.10</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Glycine</td>
									<td align="center">2.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.24</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Tyrosine</td>
									<td align="center">1.20</td>
									<td align="center">0.07</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Cystine</td>
									<td align="center">0.52</td>
									<td align="center">0.17</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> (2008)</xref> reportaron que los flóculos presentan una considerable cantidad de nitrógeno no aminoacídico como sales de amonio, pero también posiblemente urea, nucleótidos y azúcar amino, los cuales pueden surgir de la actividad metabólica de los microorganismos y camarones. Estos mismos autores compararon el perfil de AAE de tres muestras de biofloc, dos dominadas por microalgas (clorofitas y diatomeas) y la otra por bacterias versus el perfil de AAE de dos alimentos balanceados para camarón y reportaron que fueron similares; esto indica que la calidad de la proteína de los organismos presentes en el biofloc fue alta. </p>
				<p><italic>“Score” químico e índice de aminoácidos esenciales (EAAI).</italic> En la <xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">tabla 3</xref> se presenta el “score” químico y el EAAI de los aminoácidos presentes en el biofloc. El “score” químico del triptófano fue el menor (0.56), resultando el primer aminoácido limitante, lo que significa que el biofloc solo puede satisfacer aproximadamente la mitad del requerimiento del camarón para este aminoácido. De igual forma, los scores de la isoleucina (0.70) y la lisina (0.80) resultaron ser segundo y tercer aminoácidos limitantes en la muestra de biofloc del macrocosmos.</p>
				<p>Algunos factores influyen en la calidad de las fuentes proteicas, como el perfil de aminoácidos (“score” de AAE) y la digestibilidad (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Toledo <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). El “score” químico de AAE evalúa el nivel de cada AAE de forma individual y el valor 1.00 indica que el nivel del AAE en particular dentro de la proteína dietética es idéntico al requerimiento de ese aminoácido esencial del animal. El valor más bajo, señala el primer aminoácido limitante. Por otra parte, el índice de aminoácido esencial (EAAI) evalúa el grado de AAE de la muestra entera en relación con la composición o requerimientos de AAE del animal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Montoya-Martínez <italic>et al</italic>. 2016</xref>). </p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t6">
						<label>Table 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Chemical score and essential amino acid index (EAAI) of the biofloc generated in the macrocosm tank with water from the Ecuadorian Pacific.</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="justify">EAA</th>
									<th align="center">Biofloc</th>
									<th align="center">Shrimp requirements</th>
									<th align="center">Chemical score <sup>1</sup></th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Lysine</td>
									<td align="center">1.31</td>
									<td align="center">1.64</td>
									<td align="center">0.80</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Methionine</td>
									<td align="center">0.69</td>
									<td align="center">0.66</td>
									<td align="center">1.00</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Arginine</td>
									<td align="center">1.89</td>
									<td align="center">1.96</td>
									<td align="center">0.96</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Leucine</td>
									<td align="center">2.17</td>
									<td align="center">2.37</td>
									<td align="center">0.91</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Valine</td>
									<td align="center">1.68</td>
									<td align="center">1.40</td>
									<td align="center">1.00</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Threonine</td>
									<td align="center">1.6</td>
									<td align="center">1.18</td>
									<td align="center">1.00</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Histidine</td>
									<td align="center">0.86</td>
									<td align="center">0.80</td>
									<td align="center">1.00</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Isoleucine</td>
									<td align="center">1.22</td>
									<td align="center">1.73</td>
									<td align="center">0.70</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Phenylalanine </td>
									<td align="center">1.45</td>
									<td align="center">1.40</td>
									<td align="center">1.00</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">Tryptophan</td>
									<td align="center">0.28</td>
									<td align="center">0.50</td>
									<td align="center">0.56</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify">EAAI</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.89</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p><sup>1</sup>EAA of the sample / EAA of shrimp requirements. An amount of 1.00 was taken as maximum</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>El EAAI que se halló en este estudio fue de 0.89, lo que clasifica como material proteico útil según Castell &amp; Tiews (1980). Este EAAI fue igual al biofloc preferentemente de bacterias reportado por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> (2008)</xref> y superiores al que exhibió la harina de soya (0.87) en <italic>Penaeus monodon</italic> según <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Peñaflorida (1989)</xref>. No obstante, fueron inferiores a bioflocs dominados por microalgas (0.91 y 0.92) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al.</italic> 2008</xref>). Estos valores sugieren que el biofloc experimental puede proporcionar una fuente de proteína de alta calidad para el crecimiento del camarón y puede suplementar un alimento balanceado. </p>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ju <italic>et al</italic>. (2008)</xref> plantearon que un EAAI cercano o igual a 1.0 indica que la dieta contiene un perfil aminoácidos similar al que se encuentra en todo el cuerpo del camarón y se asume que es equivalente a los requisitos dietéticos de este. Refieren, además, que en general los ingredientes o los piensos con un EAAI de más de 0.90 se consideran alimentos de buena calidad proteica o materiales proteicos, con un EAAI de 0.80 son útiles, y por debajo de 0.70 son inadecuados, según la clasificación descrita por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Oser (1959)</xref>. </p>
				<p>No obstante, la capacidad de un alimento de satisfacer las necesidades de aminoácidos de un animal depende de la tasa de consumo, la biodisponibilidad (digestibilidad) y su composición (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Toledo <italic>et al.</italic> 2015</xref>). En tal sentido, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Forster y Dominy (2005)</xref> refieren que los alimentos con un puntaje bajo de AAE requerirán la adición de estos, ya sea por otras fuentes de proteínas o suplementos de aminoácidos sintéticos, para obtener un rendimiento animal comparable al de una dieta de alta calidad. El biofloc, sin embargo, surge naturalmente de los subproductos del cultivo de camarón (residuos metabólicos, heces y nutrientes lixiviados de los piensos, etc.), proporcionando una fuente renovable de nutrientes para los camarones sin costo adicional para los acuicultores. </p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="conclusions">
				<title>CONCLUSIONES</title>
				<p>El biofloc que se generó con agua del Pacífico ecuatoriano presentó una adecuada calidad proteica, en cuanto a su composición aminoacídica, score químico e índice de aminoácidos esenciales, de ahí que puede servir de suplemento al alimento balanceado para el cultivo de camarón con tecnología biofloc.</p>
			</sec>
		</body>
	</sub-article>
</article>