Introduction
⌅Selection indexes have been shown to constitute a highly precise way of conducting animal selection, considering several traits. In this way, the relationship among all characters is considered, which includes their genetic values and economic weights, to simultaneously improve a group of characters in different species. The main objective of selection is to improve the total economic value or aggregate genotype (H) of the population, which is defined for each animal as the sum of each of the genotypes for the selected characters, weighting each one by its relative economic value (Hazel and Lush 1942Hazel, L.N. & Lush, J.L. 1942. The efficiency of three methods of selection. Journal of Heredity, 33(11): 393–399, ISSN: 1465-7333. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105102. and Hazel 1943Hazel, L.N. 1943. The Genetic Basis for Constructing Selection indexes. Genetics, 28(6): 476-490, ISSN: 1943-2631. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/28.6.476.). Currently, to form the indexes, the principal components procedure is used with the genetic values, as applied by Bignardi et al. (2012)Bignardi, A.B., El Faro, L., Rosa, G.J.M., Cardoso, V.L., Machado, P.F. & Albuquerque, L.G. 2012. Short communication. Principal components and factor analytic models for test-day milk yield in Brazilian Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 95: 2157-2164, ISSN: 1525-3198. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4494. and Khan et al. (2013)Khan, T.A., Tomar, A.K.S., Dutt, T. & Bhushan, B. 2013. Principal component regression analysis in lifetime milk yield prediction of crossbred cattle strain Vrindavani of North India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 83(12): 1288–1291, ISSN: 2394-3327. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v83i12.35805. Available at: https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/35805.. In Cuba, Hernández and Ponce de León (2018Hernández, A. & Ponce de León, R. 2018. Índices de selección en ganado Mambí de Cuba mediante el análisis de componentes principales. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 30 (12), Article #197. Available at: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd30/12/arel30197.html., 2020Hernández, A. & Ponce de León, R. 2020. Índices de selección para la mejora genética de vacas Siboney de Cuba. Archivos de Zootecnia, 69 (265): 46-53, ISSN: 1885-4494. https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v69i265.5038. Available at: https://www.uco.es/ucopress/az/index.php/az/.) have also used it.
Currently, the buffalo genetic improvement program in Cuba is based on genetic evaluations of mothers for milk production and the results of performance tests of grazing males. The males that enter performance tests come from the best mothers for milk production. Performance tests are evaluations of male (calves) growth from different herds, from the same company, from weaning to eight months, and extend over a year under grazing conditions. At the end of the test, the best animals for future sires are determined, considering their growth and milk production of their mothers during lactation in percentage terms, both respectively weighted (60:30) according to Mitat et al. (2010)Mitat, A., Lezcano, J., Pérez, M., García, A., García, J., Ramos, R., Valero, C., Padrón E., Fraga, L.M., Uffo, O., Domínguez, A. & Arias, Y. 2010. Bases para la elaboración del programa de mejoramiento genético de los búfalos en Cuba. Programa integral de ganadería. Ministerio de Agricultura..
Selection methods that consider bovine milk production have evolved in the last 100 years (Weigel et al. 2017Weigel, K.A., Van Raden, P.M., Norman, H.D. & Grosu, H. 2017. A 100-Year Review: Methods and impact of genetic selection in dairy cattle—From daughter–dam comparisons to deep learning algorithms. Journal of Dairy Science, 100: 10234–10250, ISSN: 1525-3198. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12954.), although less so in buffalo species, in which meat production is beginning to be of particular interest, in addition to milk, due to its productivity and profitability, which has been pointed out by Ranjhan (2004)Ranjhan, S. 2004. Commercial production of buffalo meat with social agenda. Proceedings - Invited papers volume I 7th World Buffalo Congress. Makati City. Philippines. ISBN 971-748-020-6. p. 1. when referring to global commercial production, and more recently by García et al. (2017)García, D., Fraga L.M., García, Y., Sánchez A. & Zimón, M. 2017. Reproductive performance in a Cuban buffalo Enterprise. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 51(4): 409-416, ISSN: 2079-3480. as far as Cuba is concerned. According to Mrode and Thompson (2005)Mrode, R.A. & Thompson, R. 2005. Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. Second edition. CABI Publishing. UK. ISBN 0 85199 000 2. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990002.0000. and Miglior et al. (2017)Miglior, F., Fleming, A., Brito, L, Martin, P. & Baes, F. 2017. A 100-Year Review: Identification and genetic selection of economically important traits in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 100: 10251–10271, ISSN: 1525-3198. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12968., most of the selection indexes in the world focus on increasing the production of milk and its constituents, having a lower focus on meat production. According to the cited authors, this reality applies to most countries, except for Scandinavia, which selection indexes also include conformation. The ANASB (2020a)ANASB 2020a. Índice genético búfalas y toros. N° 38. AssociazioneNazionaleAllevatoriSpecie Bufalina. Caserta-Italia. catalog is a sample of the method used in Italy for buffalo production in the country, specifically aimed at legs, mammary system, milk, fat, protein and yield.
Improvements have been found in all traits when the indices are used, but in growth traits they have been less used, and much less in buffaloes, despite the fact that some pre-weaning and post-weaning growth traits have shown the possibility of genetic improvement. The selection and use of indexes have been recommended in the bubaline species (Ramos and Fraga 2008Ramos, A. & Fraga L.M. 2008. Programa de mejoramiento genético del búfalo brasileño: interpretación y aplicación. IV Simposio de Búfalas de las Américas, Mérida, Venezuela.p.15.). Specifically, in Colombia, Agudelo et al. (2016)Agudelo, D.A. Agudelo, J.H. & Cerón, M.F. 2016. Selection index for meat and milk traits of buffaloes in Colombia. Livestock Science, 191: 6-11, ISSN: 1878-0490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.06.016. have advocated it, as well as Taheri and De Seno (2016)Taheri, B. & De Seno L. 2016. Investigation of response to selection for milk traits in dairy buffalo of Iran based on three sale situations. Buffalo Bulletin, 35(3): 405, ISSN: 2539-5696. in Iran. Endris (2020)Endris, M. 2020. Review on selection index in animal breeding. Tesis PhD. School of animal and Range Science. HaramayaUniversity. Etiopía. ID. No: PhD/ 059/12. have applied it in Ethiopia, and the ANASB (2020b)ANASB 2020b.Selection activities. R&D office. Buffalo Newspaper. Bulletin of the FAO-Escorena Inter Regional Cooperative Research Network on Buffalo and of International Buffalo Federation. No. 36. December 2020. p. 21-25. Italia. Available at: https://internationalbuffalofed.org/newsletters/. catalog in Italy is evidence of its use. However, this methodology is rarely used, because a large part of the buffalo population is in the hands of small producers with low resources and little or no application of management and genetic selection technologies (Reggeti 2004Reggeti, J. 2004 Recent developments of buffalo system in South and North America. Proceedings - Invited papers volume I 7th World Buffalo Congress. Makati City. Philippines. ISBN 971-748-020-6. p.7.). This important method depends on the definition of the selection objectives, as well as the feasibility of measuring the selection criteria to be used and the economic control by producers.
The objective of this study was to describe the evolution of the indicators that have occurred in the buffalo species during a period of six years in a enterprise in Cuba, and from this information to build an index for buffalo selection in performance tests.
Materials and methods
⌅The information was taken from the Empresa Pecuaria Genética Los Naranjos, in Cuba, from performance tests carried out on buffaloes grazing Cynodon nlemfuensis, at a rate of 0.6 to 1.0 animals/ha, for an average of 12.72 months. The animals subjected to this test were those that, during the birth campaign, on three occasions, had good weights at weaning and came from mothers that phenotypically had higher milk productions during the birth years (between 2011 and 2017), for a total of 241 individuals. This database records the indicators weight at weaning at eight months (WW), final weight (FW) at 20 months, daily weight gain (DWG) 8-20 months, weight per age (WPA) and total milk production of their mothers (MPM) at 244 d of lactation, as well as their percentage values in relation to the mean for each year.
SAS (2013)SAS Institute Inc. 2013. Statistical Analysis Software SAS/STAT®. Version 9.1.3, Cary, N.C., USA, Available at: http://www.sas.com/en_us/software/analytics/stat.html#. mixed model was used with Proc GLIMMIX (Wolfinger and O'Connell 1993Wolfinger, R. & Connell, M. 1993. Generalized linear models a pseudo-likelihood approach. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 48(3-4): 233-243, ISSN: 0094-9655. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949659308811554. and Schabenberger 2006Schabenberger, O. 2006. Introducing the GLIMMIX Procedure for Generalized Linear Mixed Models, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. USA.) to process the measures of WW, FW, DWG, WPA and MPM after identifying with Proc SEVERITY the most adjusted distribution to the data, which resulted in gamma, and use of the log link. The Proc IML of SAS (2013)SAS Institute Inc. 2013. Statistical Analysis Software SAS/STAT®. Version 9.1.3, Cary, N.C., USA, Available at: http://www.sas.com/en_us/software/analytics/stat.html#. was used with a program developed from the procedure indicated by Duangjinda (2007)Duangjinda, M. 2007. SAS/IML for Best Linear Unbiased Prediction. Department of Animal Science KhonKaen University, Thailand 40002. ISBN 974-9992-65-2. and Elzo and Vergara (2007)Elzo, M.A. & Vergara, O.D. 2007. Modelación aplicada a las ciencias animales: II. Evaluaciones genéticas. Biogénesis. Primera edición: ISBN: 978-958-8748-58-0. to obtain the genetic values or predicted transmittingability (GV/PTA) of a two-character model (weaning weight and final live weight) with its precision, with a kinship matrix composed by the genealogy (35 fathers and 215 mothers) and the 241 observations of tested animals, which formed a kinship matrix of 491 individuals, obtained with the application of SAS INBRED Proc (2013)SAS Institute Inc. 2013. Statistical Analysis Software SAS/STAT®. Version 9.1.3, Cary, N.C., USA, Available at: http://www.sas.com/en_us/software/analytics/stat.html#.. The year of entry to the performance test was taken as fixed effect in both procedures (Glimmix and two-character), which had six levels corresponding to the years 2011 and 2012 until 2017 (united due to insufficient information from the first year).
Differences among means of year fixed effects were estimated by Kramer (1956)Kramer, C.Y. 1956. Extension of Multiple Range Tests to Group Means with Unequal Numbers of Replications. Biometrics, 12(3): 307–310, ISSN: 0006-341X. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001469.. With these objectives, the following mixed model was used in Glimmix:
where:
μ = Constant or general mean, common to all observations
αi = Fixed effect of the i-th year of start of the test (i=2011/2012…, 2017)
aj(αi) = Random effect of the j-th animal (j=1.2…, 241) nested on the i-th starting year (in the case of the two-character to obtain the GVs, no nesting was performed).
eijkl = Random error associated with observations normally distributed with mean 0 and variance δ2e.
y
Pd and Pf represent the weight at weaning and at the end of the test, their means (µPd and µPf), their phenotypic variances (VPd, VPf) and covariances (CovPdPf), variances (VGPd2 and VGPf2) and covariances (CovVGPdVGPf) of their genetic values, as well as the respective relative economic values. All represented in a matrix form.
Results and discussion
⌅The relative results of the performance of the variables processed by year of entry into testing are shown in table 1. Although these values are acceptable, they are still below the objectives of the genetic improvement plan for buffaloes in Cuba (Mitat et al. 2010Mitat, A., Lezcano, J., Pérez, M., García, A., García, J., Ramos, R., Valero, C., Padrón E., Fraga, L.M., Uffo, O., Domínguez, A. & Arias, Y. 2010. Bases para la elaboración del programa de mejoramiento genético de los búfalos en Cuba. Programa integral de ganadería. Ministerio de Agricultura.). A variable performance was recorded for all the evaluated indicators, which decreased in recent years, partly due to the low selection index applied (Mitat 2022Mitat, A. 2022. Búfalos de agua. I. Comportamiento del rebaño Buffalypso puro en Cuba. Revista de Producción Animal, 34(1): e4092, ISSN: 2224-7920. Available at: https://revistas.reduc.edu.cu/index.php/rpa/article/view/e4092.) and for unspecified reasons. For these reasons, it is considered that measures should be adopted to achieve higher weights. In particular, with regard to genetics, a more precise selection than the one currently carried out should be proposed, regardless of whether work is done on other possible non-genetic improvement paths.
Years of beginning of the performance test | Weight at weaning, eight months | Final weight, 20 months | Gain 8-20 months | Weight per age, 20 months | Milk production of mothers in eight months | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean, kg | SE ± | Mean, kg | SE ± | Mean, g/day | SE ± | Mean, g/day | SE ± | Mean, kg | SE ± | |
2011-2012 | 136.43a | 1.65 | 285.39a | 5.28 | 317.05a | 10.53 | 413.34a | 7.49 | 1068.43ab | 30.01 |
2013 | 148.80b | 1.52 | 306.48b | 4.86 | 390.89b | 9.70 | 454.60b | 6.89 | 1135.42a | 27.64 |
2014 | 140.17a | 1.26 | 326.56c | 4.03 | 440.43c | 8.04 | 475.52b | 5.72 | 1072.55ab | 22.91 |
2015 | 141.07ac | 1.33 | 333.35c | 4.26 | 496.10d | 8.50 | 501.92c | 6.04 | 1032.28abc | 24.21 |
2016 | 151.92b | 1.20 | 320.62c | 3.84 | 320.26a | 7.65 | 453.57b | 5.44 | 944.04c | 21.81 |
2017 | 145.69c | 1.48 | 310.20d | 4.72 | 309.84a | 9.42 | 459.74b | 6.70 | 1013.17bc | 26.84 |
Pvalue | <.0001 | <.0001 | <.0001 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
a,b,c,d Values with different letters per column differ at P˂0.05 (Kramer 1956Kramer, C.Y. 1956. Extension of Multiple Range Tests to Group Means with Unequal Numbers of Replications. Biometrics, 12(3): 307–310, ISSN: 0006-341X. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001469.)
The phenotypic and genetic correlations of the index of milk production of mothers (%) were low for all the evaluated indicators (table 2), so it was considered that their inclusion in a selection index was not advisable. It was determined to give it more importance through other selection methods in the program, and to consider the weight at weaning and final weight at 20 months. These had a genetic correlation that, although it reached a medium and significant value, showed a certain independence among their own genes, which proved to be completely independent of the milk production of their respective mothers.
Weight at weaning | Weight at 20 months | DWG, % | WPA, % | MPM, % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight at weaning | 1.00 | 0.36008 <.0001 |
0.12397 0.0546 |
0.17912 0.0053 |
-0.05434 0.4010 |
Weight at 20 months | 0.31575 <.0001 |
1.00 | 0.35679 <.0001 |
0.41925 <.0001 |
-0.01493 0.8176 |
DWG, % | 0.11784 0.0684 |
0.82696 <.0001 |
1.00 | 0.80894 <.0001 |
0.06194 0.3383 |
WPA, % | 0.16026 0.0129 |
0.90789 <.0001 |
0.80262 <.0001 |
1.00 | 0.07263 0.2614 |
MPM, % | -0.04504 0.4874 |
0.02631 0.6851 |
0.01925 0.7666 |
0.01349 0.8353 |
1.00 |
DWG: daily weight gain WPA: weight per age MPM: milk production of mothers
In Brazil, Falleiro et al. (2013)Falleiro, V., Silveira, E. & Ramos, A. 2013. Genetic Correlation for Pre-Weaning and Post-Weaning Traits of Mediterranean Buffaloes from Brazil, Estimated by Bayesian Inference. Buffalo Bulletin, 32(2): 650-653, ISSN: 2539-5696. with Mediterranean buffaloes obtained a higher, equally significant, genetic correlation of 0.75 between weaning weight at 205 d and weight after 305 d. Meanwhile, the phenotypic was also high and significant, with a value of 0.67. This is explained by the greater proximity among the ages evaluated (205 vs. 305 d) by these authors in relation to the present study (244 vs. 608 d). As this correlation was not high enough to guarantee a high correlated response, by ignoring one of the two and considering what was suggested by Mrode and Thompson (2005)Mrode, R.A. & Thompson, R. 2005. Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. Second edition. CABI Publishing. UK. ISBN 0 85199 000 2. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990002.0000. regarding the elimination bias (culling bias), it would be justified to combine both characteristics in an index that weights them in an added value that minimizes said bias. According to the cited authors, this bias is incurred when selecting by final weight without taking into account the weight at weaning, when only the preselected animals are tested.
It is suggested not to consider the inclusion of the percentage index of the milk production of mothers, as it is currently done in the improvement plan in Cuba, and to consider it in the preselection of the animals to be tested, as well as in a procedure of further selection, which finally considers, together with the proposed index, the genetic value of said mothers. This is estimated, on the other hand, from the information in the database of all the enterprise mothers, and not from those whose offspring were subjected to tests, even based on several lactations.
The selection index carried out like this, combines a characteristic (weight at weaning) that has high maternal genetic determination, due to its direct and indirect effects (Telo da Gama et al. 2004Telo da Gama, L., Pereira de Matos, C. & Carolino, N. 2004. Modelos Mistos em Merolhamento Animal. DGV. Ministerio do Agricultura. Desenvolvimento Rural e Pescas. Portugal. p. 101. and Mrode and Thompson 2005Mrode, R.A. & Thompson, R. 2005. Linear models for the prediction of animal breeding values. Second edition. CABI Publishing. UK. ISBN 0 85199 000 2. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990002.0000.) with the weight at the end of the performance test at 20 months. With respect to the latter, this study presented a certain independence of genetic nature (rg=0.31575), which with its economic weightings would bring it closer to an ideal of desirable characteristics of an aggregate genotype, so it could replace the currently used method. Thus, this subindex would be combined with a comprehensive index that includes the genetic values corresponding to the mothers of the individuals in performance test, obtained by evaluating all mothers for milk production. This aspect deserves further study. In Brazil, Daher (2010)Daher, E. 2010. Selection Index for Dairy Buffaloes. 9 th World Buffalo Congress. Buenos Aires, Argentina. April 25-28. https://www.wbc2010.org. suggests a similar treatment with buffaloes, but in milk production, with the purpose of modifying the lactation curve in a desirable direction.
Table 3 shows the 20 best and worst individuals, according to the evaluated index that represents all the animals in the analyzed period. However, it is possible that the interest lies in the assessment of a specific period, particularly the last year, although when the assessment considers the entire population over several years, greater precision in the evaluation is guaranteed. This procedure is more reliable than with percentage values as practiced until now, although the weighting values may vary according to the interests of the producer.
Merit | Identification | Best | Identification | Worst |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 207-16 | 2.7757 | 281-10 | -1.3130 |
2 | 117-10 | 2.5739 | 385-10 | -1.3937 |
3 | 495-13 | 2.2385 | 75 15 | -1.4098 |
4 | 327-13 | 2.1560 | 707-12 | -1.4394 |
5 | 107-14 | 2.0502 | 457-10 | -1.4762 |
6 | 385-14 | 1.9811 | 263-10 | -1.5219 |
7 | 143-13 | 1.9793 | 379 15 | -1.5228 |
8 | 113-13 | 1.9578 | 133-10 | -1.5506 |
9 | 263-14 | 1.9560 | 155 15 | -1.5578 |
10 | 125-14 | 1.8618 | 301-12 | -1.6331 |
11 | 121-14 | 1.8484 | 129-16 | -1.6547 |
12 | 111-12 | 1.8313 | 217-10 | -1.7192 |
13 | 445-10 | 1.8143 | 269-10 | -1.7390 |
14 | 381-14 | 1.7390 | 265-10 | -1.7793 |
15 | 111-13 | 1.6591 | 297-12 | -1.8681 |
16 | 323-13 | 1.6403 | 333-12 | -2.0152 |
17 | 133-14 | 1.5686 | 327-10 | -2.0681 |
18 | 329-13 | 1.5443 | 597 15 | -2.0771 |
19 | 63-14 | 1.5399 | 1405-12 | -2.2349 |
20 | 113-14 | 1.5381 | 295-10 | -2.5614 |
With the use of the IML, this procedure could be applied for other characteristics of economic interest in bubaline production, so it represents an example here. Both with the IML and with the multicharacter, which would contemplate an aggregate genotype with more than two characters, its application is preferable where there are no large populations with extensive genealogical history. There are various ways or methods of carrying out the selection and fulfill the evaluations with specific and complex programs (ASREML by Gilmour et al. 2003Gilmour, A.R., Gogel, B.J., Cullis, B.R., Welham, S.J. & Thompson, R. 2003. ASREML. User Guide Release 1.10.) or perform a more precise selection with the covariance adjustment of the growth curve from the weighings carried out at other ages during the test or proceed to form the indexes using the procedure of the principal components of the genetic values, as pointed out by Bignardi et al. (2012)Bignardi, A.B., El Faro, L., Rosa, G.J.M., Cardoso, V.L., Machado, P.F. & Albuquerque, L.G. 2012. Short communication. Principal components and factor analytic models for test-day milk yield in Brazilian Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 95: 2157-2164, ISSN: 1525-3198. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4494. and Khan et al. (2013)Khan, T.A., Tomar, A.K.S., Dutt, T. & Bhushan, B. 2013. Principal component regression analysis in lifetime milk yield prediction of crossbred cattle strain Vrindavani of North India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 83(12): 1288–1291, ISSN: 2394-3327. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v83i12.35805. Available at: https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJAnS/article/view/35805..
In Cuba, Hernández and Ponce de León (2018Hernández, A. & Ponce de León, R. 2018. Índices de selección en ganado Mambí de Cuba mediante el análisis de componentes principales. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 30 (12), Article #197. Available at: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd30/12/arel30197.html., 2020Hernández, A. & Ponce de León, R. 2020. Índices de selección para la mejora genética de vacas Siboney de Cuba. Archivos de Zootecnia, 69 (265): 46-53, ISSN: 1885-4494. https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v69i265.5038. Available at: https://www.uco.es/ucopress/az/index.php/az/.) have studied the genetic objectives defined by the most important principal components that allow several characteristics to be incorporated into the index.
Shook (2006)Shook, G.G. 2006. Major Advances in Determining Appropriate Selection Goals. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(4): 1349–1361, ISSN: 1525-3198. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72202-0. pointed out the use of subindexes that are subsequently combined into a general index and can be one more alternative to achieve the objective of total economic merit. These aspects are being analyzed with this same information in order to evaluating more precise selection methods.
Nevertheless, the general index methodology indicated in this paper, based on a sub-index for weaning weight and final weight of the test, as well as another sub-index for the milk production of mothers, although it is not addressed in this article, it is carried out in the country with other procedures, and it constitutes an example of what could happen when populations for improvement are not large at country or enterprise level. This procedure could be a guide or example, taking into consideration other characteristics of economic interest. In this way, the bubaline species in Cuba could have a more precise genetic evaluation and make a greater contribution, as Yadav (2004)Yadav, M.P. 2004. Prospects of improving buffalo production in India. 7th World Buffalo Congress. Proceedings - Invited Papers. Volume I. Pag. 63. Makati City. Philippines. points out when referring not only to milk production, but also to meat production of high commercial value and nutritional quality.
Conclusions
⌅It is concluded that the selection index constructed from the variances and covariances of the genetic and phenotypic values, economically weighted as a regression of the deviations from their means of weaning and final weight, is a reliable method for the selection of buffaloes in performance tests.