Platycyamus regnellii (Fabaceae), native to Brazil, is distributed from southern Bahia to Espírito Santo States, Goiás, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, Paraná, and São Paulo states, especially, in the altitude semi deciduous forests. This plant is used to recover degraded areas and their wood in civil construction and carpentry, in the treatment of fever, poor digestion, and inappetence. Also, as medicinal plant against diabetes (Cruz et al. 2022 Cruz, P.M. da S.N., Araujo, T.A. de S., Andrade, B. de A., Correa, A.J.C., Vilanova, M.V. de S. & Amorim, E.L.C. 2022. "Medicinal plants and diabetes: An ethnopharmacological study in Brazilian Northeast". Boletín Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas, 21(5): 593-606, ISSN: 0717-7917. https://doi.org/10.37360/blacpma.22.21.5.36 ) and, for having showy flowers, in landscaping in parks and gardens. In addition, P. regnellii can be used in consortium with pastures in order to provide shade for cattle (e.g. thermal comfort) and improving the quality of the pasture (e.g. nutrient recycling) (Martins et al. 2008 Martins J.L., Fagnani M.A., Silva I.J.O., Piedade S.M.S. & Conceição M.N. 2008. "Evaluation of the arboreal shades quality in pasture". Livestock Environment VIII, 31 August - 4 September 2008, Iguassu Falls, Brazil. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25592 ). However, the arthropodfauna of this plant is little studied with only Phenacoccus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) related as a potential pest (Gomes 2018 Gomes J.B. 2018. Horizontal stratification of phytophagous insects, and natural enemies and foliar compound chemicals on Platycyamus regnellii Benth. (Fabaceae) in a degraded area. UFVJM, Diamantina, 50p., CDD 634.9 Available: http://acervo.ufvjm.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/1885, [Consulted: September 01, 2018]. ).
Insects can damage different parts of the plant or its leaves (adaxial and abaxial faces). Knowledge of the preferred leaf face is important for pest control (Damascena et al. 2017 Damascena J.G., Leite G.L.D., Silva F.W.S., Soares M.A., Guanabens R.E.M., Sampaio R.A. & Zanuncio J.C. 2017. "Spatial distribution of phytophagous insects, natural enemies, and pollinators on Leucaena leucocephala (Fabaceae) trees in the Cerrado". Florida Entomologist, 100: 558-565, ISSN: 1938-5102. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0311. ), which is more difficult for those who live and feed on the abaxial. Sucking insects, in general, prefer abaxial leaf face due to it has softer tissue, thinner epidermis, and more prominent ribs (Damascena et al. 2017 Damascena J.G., Leite G.L.D., Silva F.W.S., Soares M.A., Guanabens R.E.M., Sampaio R.A. & Zanuncio J.C. 2017. "Spatial distribution of phytophagous insects, natural enemies, and pollinators on Leucaena leucocephala (Fabaceae) trees in the Cerrado". Florida Entomologist, 100: 558-565, ISSN: 1938-5102. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0311. ), besides of to greater protection against climatic factors (e.g. solar radiation) and natural enemies. On the other hand, arthropods may prefer the adaxial leaf face due to lower force applied to remain on this face (Salerno et al. 2018 Salerno G., Rebora M., Gorb E. & Gorb S. 2018. "Attachment ability of the polyphagous bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) to different host plant surfaces". Scientific Reports, 8, ISSN: 2045-2322. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29175-2 ). Relationships between insects can be intra or interspecific, with or without prejudice to the individuals involved - harmonic (e.g. protocooperation ants and sucking insects) or when at least one is harmed - disharmonious (e.g. predation or competition) (Leite et al. 2012 Leite G.L.D., Veloso R.V.S., Zanuncio J.C., Almeida C.I.M., Ferreira P.S.F., Fernandes G.W. & Soares M.A. 2012. "Habitat complexity and Caryocar brasiliense herbivores (Insecta: Arachnida: Araneae)". Florida Entomologist, 95: 819-830. ISSN: 1938-5102 https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0402 ). It is evaluated the ecological indices (abundance, diversity, and species richness) and interactions between the groups of arthropods on P. regnellii leaf surface, during 24 months, in a degraded area.
The work was carried out in a degraded area of the “Instituto de Ciências Agrárias da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (ICA/UFMG)” in the municipality of Montes Claros, Minas Gerais state, Brazil (latitude 16º 51' 38" S, longitude 44º 55' 00" W, altitude 943 m) for 24 months (April 2015 to March 2017). The climate of this area, according to the Köppen climate classification, is tropical dry, with annual precipitation between 1000 and 1300 mm, dry winter and average annual temperature ≥ 18 ºC. The soil is Neosol Litolic with an Alic horizon (Silva et al. 2020 Silva J.L., Leite G.L.D., Tavares W.S., Silva F.W.S., Sampaio R.A., Azevedo A.M., Serrão J.E. & Zanuncio J.C. 2020. "Diversity of arthropods on Acacia mangium (Fabaceae) and production of this plant with dehydrated sewage sludge in degraded area". Royal Society Open Science, 7: 1-12, ISSN: 2054-5703. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191196. ).
The P. regnellii seedlings were planted in hole (40 x 40 x 40 cm) when they were 30 cm high, with a 2-meter spacing between them. The soil was corrected with dolomitic limestone, increasing base saturation to 50 %, natural phosphate, gypsum, FTE (Fritted Trace Elements), potassium chloride and micronutrients equivalent to the need determined in the soil analysis. A total of 20 L of dehydrated sewage sludge was placed in each hole (single dose) and the biochemical characteristics of this fertilizer have been reported (Silva et al. 2020 Silva J.L., Leite G.L.D., Tavares W.S., Silva F.W.S., Sampaio R.A., Azevedo A.M., Serrão J.E. & Zanuncio J.C. 2020. "Diversity of arthropods on Acacia mangium (Fabaceae) and production of this plant with dehydrated sewage sludge in degraded area". Royal Society Open Science, 7: 1-12, ISSN: 2054-5703. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191196. ). In March 2014, P. regnellii seedlings were prepared in a nursery in plastic bags (16 x 24 cm) with reactive natural phosphate mixed with the substrate at a dosage of 160 g, which were then planted in the final location in September of the same year. The seedlings were irrigated twice a week until the beginning of the rainy season (October). The design was completely randomized with 48 replications (plants), with the adaxial and abaxial leaf faces as the treatments.
Arthropods were counted on the leaf faces (adaxial and abaxial) between 7:00 and 11:00 a.m. on vertical axis (apical, middle and basal parts) and horizontal axis (north, south, east and west) of the canopy, totaling 12 leaves/plant/evaluation, in the 48 P. regnellii plants, six months of age, for 24 months. The insects captured were stored in flasks with 70 % alcohol, separated into morphospecies and sent for identification.
Data was reduced by calculating averages per replication (plant). The ecological indices (abundance, diversity and species richness) were calculated per species identified in the treatments (adaxial and abaxial faces) using the BioDiversity Professional software, Version 2 (Krebs 1998 Krebs CJ. 1998. Bray-Curtis cluster analysis. 1. Biodiversity Pro version 2. Available: http://biodiversity-pro.software.informer.com, [Consulted: May 02, 2018]. ). Abundance and species richness are the total number of individuals and species, respectively, in a sampling unit. Diversity was calculated using the Hill’ formula (1st order): N1= exp (H’), where H’ is the Shannon-Weaver diversity index, calculating the diversity with the actual species number.
Data for abundance, diversity and species richness of arthropod groups (e.g. phytophagous) were subjected to a non-parametric statistical hypothesis, the Wilcoxon signed rank test (P<0.05), using the System for Analysis Statistics and Genetics (SAEG) statistical program, version 9.1 (SAEG 2007 SAEG (System for Analysis Statistics and Genetics) 2007. Sistema para Análises Estatísticas – SAEG Versão 9.1. http://arquivo.ufv.br/saeg/ [Consulted: June 30, 2018]. ) (Supplier: “Universidade Federal de Viçosa”). The interactions between the arthropod groups were assessed by Spearman correlations (P<0.05) using this program.
The highest numbers of phytophagous insects Orthoptera Tettigoniidae and Tropidacris collaris (Romaleidae), and Hemiptera Pentatomidae; that of natural enemies Hymenoptera Camponotus sp. and Pseudomyrmex termitarius (Formicidae), and Diptera dolichopodidae; and abundance and species richness of chewing insects and protocooperanting ants were observed in the P. regnellii adaxial leaf face. The sucking insect Phenacoccus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) (≈0.37), chewing insect T. collaris (≈0.16) and the natural enemy Araneidae (≈0.52) were the arthropods with highest numbers of on P. regnellii leaves (table 1). The abundance of spiders correlated, positively, with that of chewing insects (r = 0.18, P = 0.04, n = 96), and the number of spiders with that of T. collaris (r = 0.23, P = 0.01, n = 96) on P. regnellii plants.
| Phytophagous (Class Insecta) | Leaf face | TW* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abaxial | Adaxial | VT § | P | |
| Coleoptera (Chrysomelidae): Alagoasa sp. | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Eumolpus sp. | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.27 |
| Walterianela sp. | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 1.37 | 0.08 |
| Wanderbiltiana sp | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.98 | 0.16 |
| Curculionidae: Lordops sp. | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.59 | 0.27 |
| Lepidoptera | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Orthoptera (Tettigoniidae) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.27 ± 0.08 | 3.50 | 0.00 |
| Romaleidae: Tropidacris collaris | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.08 | 2.47 | 0.01 |
| Abundance of chewing insects | 0.77 ± 0.14 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 3.26 | 0.00 |
| Diversity of chewing insects | 0.25 ± 0.12 | 0.20 ± 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.49 |
| Species richness of chewing insects | 0.63 ± 0.10 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 3.15 | 0.00 |
| Sucking insects | ||||
| Hemiptera (Aleyrodidae) | 0.46 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.91 | 0.18 |
| Cicadellidae: Balclutha hebe | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 1.42 | 0.07 |
| Erythrogonia sexguttata | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Nogodinidae: Bladina sp. | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Pentatomidae | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.21 ± 0.06 | 3.13 | 0.00 |
| Pseudococcidae: Phenacoccus sp. | 0.73 ± 0.51 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.42 | 0.07 |
| Abundance of sucking insects | 0.33 ± 0.09 | 1.19 ± 0.56 | 1.01 | 0.16 |
| Diversity of sucking insects | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Species richness of sucking insects | 0.31 ± 0.09 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 1.46 | 0.07 |
| Pollinator (Class Insecta) | ||||
| Hymenoptera (Apidae): Apis mellifera | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Natural enemies (Classes Arachnida and Insecta) | ||||
| Araneidae | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.02 ± 0.93 | 1.39 | 0.08 |
| Oxyopidae | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 1.42 | 0.07 |
| Oxyopes saliticus | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.83 | 0.20 |
| Salticidae | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Aphirape uncifera | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.37 | 0.08 |
| Uspachus sp. | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Sparassidae: Quemedice sp. | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.05 | 1.03 | 0.15 |
| Tetragnathidae: Leucauge sp. | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.04 | 0.59 | 0.27 |
| Thomisidae: Tmarus sp. | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.42 | 0.07 |
| Aphantochilus rogersi | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.42 | 0.07 |
| Abundance of spiders | 1.31 ± 0.93 | 0.33 ± 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.37 |
| Diversity of spiders | 0.17 ± 0.06 | 0.23 ± 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.47 |
| Species richness of spiders | 0.33 ± 0.08 | 0.45 ± 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.47 |
| Diptera (Dolichopodidae) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.17 ± 0.07 | 2.52 | 0.01 |
| Hymenoptera (Braconidae) | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Vespidae: Polybia sp. | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.0 | 0.15 |
| Formicidae: Brachymyrmex sp. | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.58 | 0.27 |
| Camponotus sp. | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.15 ± 0.05 | 2.73 | 0.00 |
| Cephalotes sp. | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Ectatoma sp. | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Pheidole sp. | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 1.00 | 0.15 |
| Pseudomyrmex termitarius | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 2.29 | 0.01 |
| Abundance of protocooperanting ants | 0.38 ± 0.10 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 3.64 | 0.00 |
| Diversity of protocooperanting ants | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Species richness of protocooperanting ants | 0.35 ± 0.09 | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 3.64 | 0.00 |
*TW= Test of Wilcoxon. §VT= value of test. n= 48 per treatment. --- = not generated.
Recently, research in Brazil reported the sucking insect Phenacoccus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) as the most abundant phytophagous on P. regnellii plants (Souza et al. 2021 Souza, G.F., Leite, G.L.D., Silva, F.W.S., Silva, J.L., Sampaio, R.A., Texeira, G.L., Soares, M.A. & Zanuncio, J.C. 2021. "Bottom-up effects on arthropod communities in Platycyamus regnellii (Fabaceae) fertilized with dehydrated sewage slude". Revista Colombiana de Entomología, 47 (1): e8493, ISSN: 2665-4385. https://doi.org/10.25100/socolen.v47il.8943. ) and with the highest porcentage Importance Index-Production Unknow on leaves of P. regnellii (Leite 2022 Leite G.L.D. 2022. "Arthropods as possible loss and solution sources on Platycyamus regnellii (Benth) (Fabales: Fabaceae) saplings". International Journal of Pest Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2022.2131933 ).
The greatest numbers of the phytophagous insects Pentatomidae, Tettigoniidae, and T. collaris, and of the natural enemies Camponotus sp., Dolichopodidae, and P. termitarius, and the abundance and species richness of chewing insects and protocooperanting ants, were noted in the adaxial leaf face on P. regnellii plants is, probably, due to the lowest force applied by these arthropods to remain on this face and the absence of trichomes on them. The choice of the adaxial leaf face, perhaps, is due to the leaf characteristics of the P. regnellii plants, which are tri-foliate pinnate (in the form of a feather) with elliptical lateral leaflets (9-15 cm long and 6.5-10 cm wide) and the central is largely elliptical (14-25 in length and 10-19 cm in width) and, mainly, with dense hair in the abaxial (Moura et al. 2016 Moura T.M., Lewis G.P. & Tozzi A.M.G.A. 2016. "A revision of the South American genus Platycyamus Benth. (Leguminosae)". Kew Bulletin, 71, ISSN: 1874-933X. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12225-016-9617-X ), maybe as a source of resistance to most arthropods in this last leaf surface. Host plant leaf characteristics such as hairiness, regular shape or not, roughness, wax content, and type and number of veins can affect the insect, choosing the leaf face (adaxial or abaxial) that requires less force applied to walking (Salerno et al. 2018 Salerno G., Rebora M., Gorb E. & Gorb S. 2018. "Attachment ability of the polyphagous bug Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) to different host plant surfaces". Scientific Reports, 8, ISSN: 2045-2322. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29175-2 ).
The largest numbers Phenacoccus sp. on P. regnellii plants can be a problem due to this sucking insect is related as pest of Abelmoschus esculentus (Malvaceae), Amaranthus flavus (Amaranthaceae), Bidens pilosa (Asteraceae), Carica papaya (Caricaceae), Gossypium hirsutum (Malvaceae), Manihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae), Solanum lycopersicum (Solanaceae), and Vitis vinifera (Vitaceae). This insect causes necrosis in the apical tissues, reduces the photosynthetic rate, leaf growth (with yellowing and fall of these), negatively affecting the plant production (e.g. M. esculenta) (Schulthess 1991 Schulthess F., Baumgärtner J.U., Delucchi V. & Gutierrez A.P. 1991. "The influence of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr. (Hom., Pseudococcidae) on yield formation of cassava, Manihot esculenta Crantz". Journal of Applied Entomology, 111: 155–165, ISSN: 1439-0418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1991.tb00306.x , Culik et al. 2007 Culik M.P., Martins D.S., Ventura J.A., Peronti A.L.B.G., Gullan P.J. & Kondo T. 2007. "Coccidae, Pseudococcidae, Ortheziidae, and Monophlebidae (Hemiptera: Coccoidea) of Espírito Santo, Brazil". Biota Neotropica, 7: 61-65, ISSN: 1676-0611. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032007000300006 and Santos and Peronti 2017 Santos R.S. & Peronti A.L.B.G. 2017. "Ocorrência de Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) em quiabeiro no estado do Acre". EntomoBrasilis, 10: 135-138, ISSN: 1983-0572. https://doi.org/10.12741/ebrasilis.v10i2.684 ). The biggest numbers of the chewing insect T. collaris on P. regnellii plants confirms its polyphagy, which has been reported to damage plants of Acacia mangium (Fabaceae), Casuarina glauca (Casuarinaceae), and Leucaena leucocephala (Fabaceae) (Poderoso et al. 2013 Poderoso J.C.M., Da Costa M.K.M., Correia-Oliveira M.E., Dantas P.C., Zanuncio J.C. & Ribeiro G.T. 2013. "Occurrence of Tropidacris collaris (Orthoptera; Acridoidea; Romaleidae) damaging Casuarina glauca (Casuarinaceae) plants in the municipality of Central Bahia, Brazil". Florida Entomologist, 96: 268-269, ISSN: 1938-5102. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0143 , Damascena et al. 2017 Damascena J.G., Leite G.L.D., Silva F.W.S., Soares M.A., Guanabens R.E.M., Sampaio R.A. & Zanuncio J.C. 2017. "Spatial distribution of phytophagous insects, natural enemies, and pollinators on Leucaena leucocephala (Fabaceae) trees in the Cerrado". Florida Entomologist, 100: 558-565, ISSN: 1938-5102. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0311. and Silva et al. 2020 Silva J.L., Leite G.L.D., Tavares W.S., Silva F.W.S., Sampaio R.A., Azevedo A.M., Serrão J.E. & Zanuncio J.C. 2020. "Diversity of arthropods on Acacia mangium (Fabaceae) and production of this plant with dehydrated sewage sludge in degraded area". Royal Society Open Science, 7: 1-12, ISSN: 2054-5703. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191196. ). The highlight of spiders, Araneidae family, on P. regnellii plants, is due to their generalist predatory habit, reducing damage by insects, mainly defoliators, in USA agroecosystems (Landis et al. 2000 Landis D.A., Wratten S.D. & Gurr G.M. 2000. "Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture". Annual Review of Entomology, 45: 175-201. ISSN: 0066-4170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.175 ), in Caryocar brasiliense (Caryocaraceae) trees, in cerrado and pasture areas, in Brazil (Leite et al. 2012 Leite G.L.D., Veloso R.V.S., Zanuncio J.C., Almeida C.I.M., Ferreira P.S.F., Fernandes G.W. & Soares M.A. 2012. "Habitat complexity and Caryocar brasiliense herbivores (Insecta: Arachnida: Araneae)". Florida Entomologist, 95: 819-830. ISSN: 1938-5102 https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0402 ), in silvopastoral systems L. leucocephala - Megathyrsus maximus (Poaceae) in Cuba (Valenciaga et al. 2020 Valenciaga, N., Ruiz, T.E., Ramirez-Avilés, L. & Parsons, D. 2020. Abundance of Heteropsylla cubana population and its natural enemies in Leucaena leucocephala agroecosystems. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 32 (11), Article #177, ISSN: 2521-9952. https://lrrd.org/public-lrrd/proofs/lrrd3211/nvalecit.html ), and those of Lycosidae and Linyphiidae in Hordeum vulgare (Poaceae) fields in different landscapes in Uppsala, Switzerland (Öberg et al. 2008 Öberg S., Mayr S. & Dauber J. 2008. "Landscape effects on recolonisation patterns of spiders in arable fields". Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 123: 211-218, ISSN: 0167-8809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.06.005 ), Ctenidae in Italy (Venturino et al. 2008 Venturino E., Isaia M., Bona F., Chatterjee S. & Badino G. 2008. "Biological controls of intensive agroecosystems: Wanderer spiders in the Langa astigiana". Ecological Complexity, 5: 157-164, ISSN: 1476-945X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.10.003. ) and Oxyopidae on A. mangium trees (Silva et al. 2020 Silva J.L., Leite G.L.D., Tavares W.S., Silva F.W.S., Sampaio R.A., Azevedo A.M., Serrão J.E. & Zanuncio J.C. 2020. "Diversity of arthropods on Acacia mangium (Fabaceae) and production of this plant with dehydrated sewage sludge in degraded area". Royal Society Open Science, 7: 1-12, ISSN: 2054-5703. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191196. ).
The positive correlation between the abundance of spiders and that of chewing insects and the number of spiders with that of T. collaris on P. regnellii plants is, probably, due to predators following their prey, as observed on C. brasiliense, L. leucocephala, and Pistacia lentiscus (Anacardiaceae) trees (Damascena et al. 2017 Damascena J.G., Leite G.L.D., Silva F.W.S., Soares M.A., Guanabens R.E.M., Sampaio R.A. & Zanuncio J.C. 2017. "Spatial distribution of phytophagous insects, natural enemies, and pollinators on Leucaena leucocephala (Fabaceae) trees in the Cerrado". Florida Entomologist, 100: 558-565, ISSN: 1938-5102. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0311. ). Spiders prey on insects in natural and agricultural systems (Venturino et al. 2008 Venturino E., Isaia M., Bona F., Chatterjee S. & Badino G. 2008. "Biological controls of intensive agroecosystems: Wanderer spiders in the Langa astigiana". Ecological Complexity, 5: 157-164, ISSN: 1476-945X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.10.003. ), often reducing defoliation and mines in plants, as related in C. brasiliense trees (Leite et al. 2012 Leite G.L.D., Veloso R.V.S., Zanuncio J.C., Almeida C.I.M., Ferreira P.S.F., Fernandes G.W. & Soares M.A. 2012. "Habitat complexity and Caryocar brasiliense herbivores (Insecta: Arachnida: Araneae)". Florida Entomologist, 95: 819-830. ISSN: 1938-5102 https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0402 ).
It is concluded that the greatest species richness and numbers of chewing insects (e.g. T. collaris) and protocooperanting ants (e.g. P. termitarius) on the adaxial leaf face on P. regnellii plants are, probably, due to the lowest force required for walking and absence of trichomes (e.g. resistance factor). The largest numbers of Phenacoccus sp. and T. collaris in P. regnellii plants is a cause for concern, as these insects are pests in several cultures. Spiders (e.g. Araneidae), natural enemies, showed greatest numbers of individuals in leaves on P. regnellii plants and followed their prey, being important in biological control.